Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Cache File Laravel Package

yiisoft/cache-file

File-based cache storage for Yii, implementing PSR-16 simple cache. Stores cached values in files with TTL support, configurable cache directory, and efficient serialization for applications needing persistent, dependency-free caching.

Deep Wiki
Context7

Technical Evaluation

yiisoft/cache-file is a narrow, single-purpose implementation of PSR-16 (Psr\SimpleCache\CacheInterface) backed by the local filesystem, published under the Yii umbrella. It is not a Laravel package: there is no service provider, no facade, no config publication, no Laravel-aware cache store. It ships as a standalone Composer library with a small surface (FileCache implementing get/set/delete/has/clear/getMultiple/setMultiple/deleteMultiple plus TTL semantics). Architecture fit is therefore "compatible but not idiomatic": it can be consumed by Laravel because Laravel can resolve arbitrary PSR-16 implementations, but it duplicates functionality Laravel already provides natively via its own file cache driver.

Architecture fit. The library's value is the PSR-16 contract, not its framework affinity. In a Laravel codebase it can serve as (a) a drop-in PSR-16 instance injected where a framework-agnostic cache is required, or (b) a backing implementation for a custom Laravel Store if we want Laravel's Cache facade to delegate to it. Both paths add an adapter layer that we would have to own. For pure Laravel workloads, config/cache.php with the built-in file driver is functionally equivalent and already integrated, so adopting this package trades vendor independence for marginal benefit.

Integration feasibility. Low-to-moderate effort: composer require yiisoft/cache-file, bind the interface in a service provider, and pass a configured path. The risk is not in wiring but in semantics: TTL handling (int seconds vs DateInterval), key validation and normalization rules (PSR-16 reserved characters), atomicity of writes under concurrency, and clear() scope all differ from Laravel's file store. Any code that assumes Laravel cache behavior (tags, remember with closures, stampede protection via locks, Cache::increment) will not translate. This package has no tag support, no lock support, and no increment/decrement; those are Laravel-driver features, not PSR-16 features.

Technical risk. Small, stable footprint keeps defect risk low, but there are real platform hazards: filesystem permissions and shared-host open_basedir constraints, performance degradation on network filesystems (NFS/EFS) due to per-file stat and locking overhead, and no distributed coherence across multiple app servers unless the path is shared storage. The 13-star count is a signal of low external scrutiny and a thin support community, which matters for a TPM if this becomes a load-bearing dependency. BSD-3-Clause is permissive and safe for commercial use, and the January 2025 release indicates continued maintenance rather than abandonment.

Key questions. (1) What actual requirement does this satisfy that Laravel's native file driver does not? (2) Is the deployment target single-node or horizontally scaled, and is the cache path on shared storage? (3) Do we need tags, locks, atomics, or counters — and if so, this package is the wrong primitive? (4) Who owns the adapter and the PSR-16 binding when the underlying library changes? (5) What is our exit cost if we later migrate to Redis or the native driver?

Integration Approach

Stack fit. Laravel's cache layer is already a driver registry with a first-class file store, so the truthful assessment is that this package is a fit for the PSR-16 seam, not for the Laravel cache seam. The right integration is dependency injection: register Psr\SimpleCache\CacheInterface bound to FileCache in a service provider, and inject it only into components that are deliberately framework-agnostic (shared libraries, domain services, third-party packages that accept PSR-16). Do not attempt to make it the primary Cache facade driver unless we have a specific, documented reason.

Migration path. Three options, in ascending cost: (a) No migration — use Laravel's file driver and skip the package, accepting native lock/tag/concurrency behavior; (b) Coexistence — add the package solely to provide a PSR-16 instance for library code, leaving the framework cache untouched; (c) Custom store — implement a Illuminate\Contracts\Cache\Store wrapper delegating to FileCache, which requires us to synthesize tags, increment, decrement, and lock behavior ourselves or explicitly declare them unsupported. Option (b) is the recommended default; option (c) should only be pursued if a hard requirement (e.g., matching an existing Yii-based sibling service's on-disk cache format) exists.

Compatibility. Verify the package's PHP constraint against our runtime (PHP 8.1+ era is expected; confirm before pinning). Confirm psr/simple-cache major version alignment with any other dependencies — PSR-16 v3 is the current line and mixed-version constraints are the usual culprit for Composer conflicts. Because the package is isolated and has near-zero transitive dependencies, conflict surface is small, but the PSR interface version must be uniform across the project.

Sequencing. (1) Spike in a non-production branch: bind the interface, write/read/expire, measure against the native driver under realistic payload sizes; (2) define the cache directory outside the repo, on a writable, non-served path, and codify permissions in deployment config; (3) add a thin policy layer documenting supported operations and key-naming rules; (4) roll out behind the PSR-16 binding only, keeping framework cache unchanged; (5) instrument hit/miss and write latency before any broader adoption.

Operational Impact

Maintenance. The package is small enough that maintenance burden is largely ours, not the vendor's: it is a stable, slow-moving library with a single maintainer ecosystem and a modest release cadence. That cuts both ways — few breaking changes, but also little proactive hardening. We should expect to own the adapter, the configuration, and any performance tuning, and we should budget roughly a sprint-day per year for dependency review rather than a standing ownership cost.

Support. The 13-star count means effectively no community support channel. Bug reports may be slow; the practical mitigation is that the code is small enough to fork and patch in-house if needed, which is a genuine advantage of the low-complexity, permissive-license dependency. This should be framed to stakeholders as a "vendored-in-spirit" dependency rather than a supported product.

Scaling. File-backed caching scales vertically and is excellent for single-node, read-heavy, moderate-cardinality workloads. It does not scale horizontally without shared storage, and even then, per-file I/O on network filesystems introduces latency and lock contention. There is no built-in stampede protection or atomic increment, so high-concurrency writes around hot keys can produce redundant regeneration. For a Laravel app approaching multi-node deployment, the correct trajectory is to treat this as a development/edge-cache tier and plan Redis (or the native driver) for production hot paths.

Failure modes. Watch for: silent cache misses from directory permission drift after deploys (containers rebuilt with different UIDs); unbounded directory growth because expired entries are not always garbage-collected promptly, requiring a scheduled prune; clear() cost and scope if the directory contains other artifacts; and key collisions or invalid-key exceptions arising from PSR-16 reserved characters. All of these are diagnosable but only if we add explicit monitoring for cache-hit ratio and directory size from day one.

Ramp-up. Developer ramp-up is near-zero for the API — it is PSR-16, which any PHP developer recognizes. The real ramp-up is conceptual: engineers must internalize that this is not the Laravel cache and lacks tags, locks, and counters, and that they must not reach for the Cache facade expecting this package's behavior. A short ADR (architecture decision record) plus a one-page usage note covering the supported surface, key conventions, and the "no tags/no locks" boundary will be more valuable than any training session. Estimate one engineer-day to integrate and document, with the caveat that the strategic recommendation may well be to document why we did not adopt it and use Laravel's native file driver instead.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
shitoudev/permissionmanager
johannesclimacus/laravel-tui
hocvt/seotools
vitalybaev/sypexgeo
amphibee/themosis-ignition
gito-me/fast-excel
frankyso/laravel-ipaymu
geolize-studio/laravel-chile
boomerangui/chat
jinas/dhivatar
store-doc/laravel-storage-driver
plus-it/laravel-translation-manager
diephp/perhaps
diephp/telegraph
osmaviation/spreadsheet
microsoft/fluentui-system-icons
mmccook/php-json-canonicalization-scheme
middlewares/firewall
qubiqx/montapacking
nyoncode/laravel-package-console