Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Starter Kit Laravue Laravel Package

yanpenalva/starter-kit-laravue

A Laravel and Vue starter kit that bundles authentication, a ready-made admin dashboard, roles and permissions, and pre-built CRUD scaffolding. Skip the repetitive boilerplate and start building full-stack applications faster with a clean, modular codebase and sensible defaults for modern web apps.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Build vs. buy for greenfield work. This is a starter kit, not a runtime dependency — the real decision it informs is "adopt a third-party scaffold vs. spend 1–2 sprints building internal boilerplate." That's a cost-of-delay comparison, not a procurement decision.
  • Time-to-first-demo. A Laravel + Vue starter kit compresses the gap between "project approved" and "stakeholders can click something." Useful when a roadmap item needs a proof of concept or a pilot squad is spinning up.
  • Standardization / house-default decision. Whether new Laravel + Vue services should all start from the same base is a one-way-ish door for team conventions, onboarding docs, and CI templates. This package is a candidate for that role.
  • Not a decision support for anything post-launch. Once forked, it is your codebase. There is no ongoing feature roadmap to track, no upgrade path to negotiate, and no vendor to hold accountable. Do not model this as a dependency in roadmap planning.
  • Roadmap signal from release cadence. v2.0.0 is a major version bump whose changelog contains only automated dependency bumps (js-yaml, lodash, serialize-javascript/terser-webpack-plugin, picomatch, brace-expansion, flatted, fast-uri, defu). Read this as: security patching is happening, feature velocity is low, and changelog discipline is weak. That's acceptable for a scaffold and disqualifying for anything you'd expect to evolve with you.
  • Risk register entry. Treat adoption as a bounded spike with an explicit exit, not an architectural commitment. Budget the cost of owning the fork from day one.

When to Consider This Package

Adopt when:

  • You are starting a new Laravel backend + Vue SPA project and have no internal scaffold to inherit.
  • The team is small and would rather not hand-roll auth, layout, and build tooling.
  • You have engineering capacity to fork, audit, and own the result — including frontend dependency triage.
  • The frontend toolchain it pins is a reasonable match for your stack (this kit's dependency set is webpack-era; confirm it aligns with your build conventions before committing).

Look elsewhere when:

  • You need vendor support, an SLA, security attestation, or procurement-friendly licensing. This is a single-maintainer, dependabot-driven repository with no LTS commitment.
  • Your stack calls for Inertia, SSR, multi-tenant, SSO/enterprise auth, or an opinionated design system — the kit's opinions will become rework.
  • You already have a platform team or an internal template repository. Adopting an external scaffold on top of that creates a second source of truth.
  • You cannot allocate time to audit the frontend dependency tree. The v2.0.0 changelog shows dependency churn without a stated breaking-change list — meaning you perform the compatibility analysis.

Specific guidance on v2.0.0:

  • The jump from v1.0.3 to v2.0.0 is semver-major, but no breaking changes, migrations, or features are documented. Assume breaking until an engineer verifies otherwise.
  • The listed bumps are almost all transitive frontend build-tooling packages and read as CVE remediation. That is a positive hygiene signal and a negative transparency signal.
  • For an existing fork: do not auto-merge. Run a spike branch, build, and smoke-test before adopting.
  • For a new project: starting fresh on v2.0.0 is reasonable; starting fresh on v1.0.3 is not.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For executives (one paragraph): This is a free, open-source starting template for building apps on Laravel (backend) and Vue (frontend). It doesn't add capability — it removes setup work, potentially saving a squad one to two sprints of boilerplate on a new product. The trade-off is ownership: once we adopt it, we own the code and its maintenance, and there is no vendor behind it. Recommendation: use it as an accelerator on a single pilot project with a named engineer owning the fork, and revisit only if it demonstrably saves time. Do not list it as a strategic dependency.

For engineering:

  • It is a scaffold, not a library. Fork-and-own, no upstream merges expected.
  • v2.0.0 is a major bump with a dependabot-only changelog — no documented breaking changes. Verify in a branch before touching any existing derivative.
  • The dependency bumps are frontend build-tooling CVEs (lodash, js-yaml, serialize-javascript, picomatch, brace-expansion, flatted, fast-uri). Good that they're patched; note that nobody is writing release notes.
  • Assess the webpack-era toolchain against our build standards before we standardize on it.
  • Success criteria for the pilot: hours saved to first deployable environment, and a clean dependency audit at fork time. If either fails, we build the template in-house.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
uni-method/symfony-lib
tacticmedia/scim-server-bundle
neika-ai/symfony-bundle
mattleads/agent-publishing-bundle
glavweb/framework-bundle
glavweb/extra-bundle
glavweb/api-bundle
glavweb/admin-bundle
adachsoft/api-version-bundle
elsayed85/laravel-api-exceptions
ouhssini/laravel-demo-mode
daworks/ncloud-outbound-mailer-driver
gp247/cms
ignibyte/aic-gates
nexa-merchant/blog
novasa/laravel-language-center
opencage/geocode
adolfoholzer/parameters
livenetworks/ln-starter
cgv/localized-resource