Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Laravel Otp Laravel Package

teckwei1993/laravel-otp

A Laravel package for generating, sending, and verifying one-time passwords (OTPs). It supports configurable code length, expiry, resend limits, and custom delivery channels, making it easy to add secure OTP verification to login, registration, or sensitive actions.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Laravel 13 upgrade planning (roadmap): v1.0.14 is a compatibility release, so this package is not a blocker on our framework upgrade timeline. It can stay in the Laravel 13 migration plan as "already resolved" rather than an open risk item to schedule engineering time against.
  • Build vs buy: an actively maintained package that tracks new major framework releases within its ecosystem is the strongest argument for buy. Every release like this is maintenance work (compat testing, deprecation cleanup, CI matrix updates) we do not have to fund internally.
  • Dependency/vendor risk review: the release cadence (now at 1.0.14) plus prompt framework support is the evidence needed to keep this dependency in the approved stack rather than flagging it for replacement or in-house reimplementation.
  • Compliance and security posture: "supports current framework major" is a common checkbox in procurement and security questionnaires. v1.0.14 lets us answer yes without an exception request.
  • Feature prioritization: because this is a patch-level compatibility release, it consumes no roadmap capacity. No user-facing feature work, no migration story, no comms needed beyond a routine dependency bump.

When to Consider This Package

Adopt when:

  • You are on, or planning, Laravel 13 — v1.0.14 explicitly covers it. Teams still on an older major are also fine; the package has not dropped prior support in this release, but confirm the supported matrix in composer.json before pinning.
  • You want a dependency with a demonstrated maintenance heartbeat. Fourteen patch releases and same-cycle framework support is a reasonable proxy for "this will not be abandoned mid-project."
  • You are standardizing on semver-stable dependencies. A 1.0.x patch that only adds framework support implies no public API change, so the upgrade is a composer update plus a test run.
  • You would otherwise build the capability yourself. If the package's scope overlaps custom code in your codebase, this is the moment to evaluate replacing that code with the maintained package.

Look elsewhere or dig deeper when:

  • Scope is unverified for your use case. This release tells us about maintenance, not about features. Before committing, confirm the package's actual capability set against your requirements — a well-maintained package that does not do what you need is still the wrong package.
  • Your application is pinned to a Laravel version the package no longer supports, or you need a support window longer than the maintainer's release cadence suggests.
  • Bus factor: if this is a single-maintainer project, framework-support releases are exactly the ones that stop first when a maintainer steps away. Check contributor spread and issue response times before treating it as infrastructure.
  • Thin wrapper risk: if the package is a small convenience layer over framework-native behavior, an in-house implementation may be cheaper than a dependency, especially where the underlying framework is adding capability.
  • You need a documented LTS or commercial support contract — patch releases do not provide that.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For executives (one paragraph): The package shipped v1.0.14, which adds support for Laravel 13. This is a maintenance release, not a feature release — no new cost, no migration project, no user-visible change. Its value is strategic: it keeps a dependency we already rely on aligned with our framework roadmap, which removes an item from the Laravel 13 upgrade critical path and means we are not funding that compatibility work ourselves. Recommendation is to take the patch, run the test suite, and keep the package in the approved stack.

For engineering (one paragraph): v1.0.14 is a patch-level compatibility update for Laravel 13. Treat it as a routine bump: update the constraint, run composer update, and validate against the existing test suite and CI matrix. No public API changes are implied by the version number; if the diff shows otherwise, escalate before merging. Action items: confirm the supported PHP/Laravel matrix in composer.json, add Laravel 13 to the CI matrix if it is not there yet, and check the changelog for any deprecation notices that did not make the release headline.

Caveat to carry into the decision: the release note covers framework support only. The adoption case above rests on maintenance health, not on functional fit — validate the package's feature set against requirements before expanding its role in the product.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
adachsoft/changelog-linter
adachsoft/collection
payerurl/telegrambot-crypto-payment-instant-payout
dskripchenko/laravel-hybrid-search
riorizkyrainey/lara-ced
mehedimi/static-vel
zharp/zharp
nonsapiens/bigquery-model-sync
lgu-bayambang-ict-office/lgu-laravel-development-standards
andydefer/laravel-support
se7enxweb/flysystem
lampwick/laravel
jeslage/statamic-emojis
micahdshackelford/rmap-laravel
draftsmaninc/draftsman
square-bit/laravel-volition
himito/laravel-mailman
htinlynn/genius-helper
maco-studios/hephaestus
elmogy/larafast