- Is symfinity/poker-planner a Laravel package or a Symfony bundle?
- The repository description points to a Symfony bundle, while the package blurb and TPM review describe a Laravel/PHP planning poker package. Treat that framework identity mismatch as a spike item before adoption. Confirm the actual framework target, registration mechanism, and supported Laravel versions in the source and composer.json.
- What Laravel and PHP versions does symfinity/poker-planner support?
- The TPM review assumes a Laravel 10/11 host on PHP 8.2+, but explicitly says to confirm the supported matrix against your own application. At v0.1.3 there is no published compatibility guarantee beyond the changelog notes. Check composer.json constraints before sequencing integration work, because a version ceiling mismatch is a common cause of stalled adoption.
- How do I install symfinity/poker-planner in a Laravel app?
- Start with Composer install, service provider registration, and publishing config and migrations. Inspect the routes or Livewire/Inertia components and look for collisions with host-domain concepts. The TPM review recommends a throwaway or low-traffic internal Laravel app for evaluation, not production adoption.
- Is symfinity/poker-planner v0.1.3 stable enough for production?
- No. A pre-1.0 0.1.x release sits in the evaluate-don't-standardize tier regardless of release content. The v0.1.3 notes only point to CHANGELOG.md and label the change Patch, with no migration guidance. Treat every bump as potentially breaking and run your test suite before upgrading.
- What changed in symfinity/poker-planner v0.1.3?
- The release notes provide a one-line pointer to CHANGELOG.md and label the release Patch. There is no summary of whether it touches published config, migrations, routes, models, events, or HTTP surface. Read the changelog diff and ask the maintainer whether the public API or persistence schema changed.
- Does symfinity/poker-planner require Redis, Mercure, or Turbo for real-time sync?
- The overview mentions guest rooms, Redis state, and Mercure plus Turbo sync. The TPM review warns that real-time behavior may require a broadcasting driver and makes assumptions about queue and websocket infrastructure. Confirm those requirements and isolate Redis and Mercure dependencies during your evaluation spike.
- What persistence model does symfinity/poker-planner use, and will migrations collide with my app?
- A planning poker tool usually holds session state and identity, so you need a clear answer on whether votes are persisted, auditable, and safe to store alongside host-domain data. Publish the migrations and inspect the schema for table-name and naming-convention collisions. Also confirm that migrations are reversible and additive before running them in a shared environment.
- Can I use symfinity/poker-planner for guest planning poker rooms without user accounts?
- The overview mentions guest rooms, but planning poker still tends to involve session identity and vote state. Confirm how guest identity, room membership, and vote persistence are handled and whether votes are auditable. This matters if non-engineering stakeholders must reach the ceremony without going through your host app.
- What are the alternatives to symfinity/poker-planner for agile estimation in Laravel?
- Alternatives include standalone SaaS planning poker tools, a small in-host Livewire or Inertia domain layer, or a more mature Laravel package if one exists. The TPM review says this package fits teams already on Laravel who want estimation ceremonies embedded in an existing tool. It is a poor fit for polyglot estates or teams without Laravel expertise to absorb the integration surface.
- How should I test symfinity/poker-planner before adopting it?
- Install it in a throwaway Laravel app, publish config and migrations, and exercise the full ceremony: create a session, vote, reveal, and re-estimate, including a second client for real-time behavior. Run your test suite on every version bump and inspect the public API, models, events, contracts, and HTTP surface. Ask the maintainer about the roadmap to 1.0, support window, SECURITY.md, and dependency-tree auditability.