Weave Code
Module Api Laravel Package
slick/module-api
Slick Module API gives Laravel applications a modular foundation for building maintainable APIs. Package endpoints into self-contained modules with their own routes, controllers, resources, and middleware, keeping large APIs organized, versionable, and easy to extend or remove.
slick/module-api provides a clean API layer for modular Laravel applications, letting each module expose its public contracts without leaking internal implementation details. It standardizes how modules register routes, resources, and service bindings so features stay decoupled and discoverable.
- Module contracts for defining stable, versioned public interfaces
- Automatic route and resource registration per module
- Service binding resolution across module boundaries
- Lightweight configuration with sensible Laravel defaults
- PSR-4 friendly structure for easy testing and extension
Frequently asked questions about Module Api
- Is slick/module-api a Laravel package?
- No. It is a Slick Framework contract package for developing Slick modules, not a Laravel package. The provided assessment notes it does not include Laravel service providers, facades, container bindings, config publishing, or Laravel-native module lifecycle integration. Treat it as an external contract rather than a native Laravel dependency.
- How do I install slick/module-api with Composer?
- You would install it with Composer using the package name slick/module-api, but first inspect its composer.json for PHP and dependency constraints. Do not assume Laravel package discovery or automatic service provider registration. Test installation in a clean Laravel app with your target PHP and Laravel versions before design work.
- Which interfaces does slick/module-api provide?
- The package is described as the interfaces required to develop a Slick module, but the exact interface list is not provided in the excerpt. Inspect the repository source and composer.json to confirm the contracts, PHP constraints, and any transitive Slick dependencies. A short technical spike is the right way to verify whether the interfaces are framework-agnostic.
- Does slick/module-api support Laravel service providers and auto-discovery?
- There is no evidence in the assessment that it provides Laravel service providers, facades, container bindings, or package discovery. It is built for Slick's module model, so Laravel integration would require an adapter or compatibility bridge. Do not make it the primary modularity mechanism in a Laravel application.
- Which Laravel and PHP versions are compatible with slick/module-api?
- The compatibility matrix is not stated in the provided context. Check the package's composer.json constraints against your target Laravel and PHP versions, and run a disposable prototype in a clean app. Because it has no visible Laravel ecosystem adoption, compatibility should be proven rather than assumed.
- Is slick/module-api safe to use in production Laravel applications?
- The assessment rates technical risk as high due to low adoption, zero stars, zero dependents, unclear maintenance cadence, and potential coupling to Slick-specific concepts. It may be simple and stable, but that is not the same as safe to standardize on. If adopted, pin the exact version, wrap it behind internal interfaces, and document an exit path.
- Can I use slick/module-api to build a modular Laravel architecture?
- Its stack fit is weak for native Laravel because Laravel favors service providers, package discovery, container binding, config publishing, and events. Using Slick module contracts as your main modularity layer would introduce a second module abstraction alongside Laravel's model. Confine it to an anti-corruption layer only if you must interoperate with Slick modules.
- Does slick/module-api require the Slick runtime or only contracts?
- The excerpt says it is an interfaces package for developing Slick modules, but it does not confirm whether runtime classes are required. You should inspect the interface definitions and dependency constraints to see if the contracts are generic enough to implement without pulling in Slick runtime assumptions. This is a key question for any Laravel spike.
- How do I migrate from Slick modules to Laravel using slick/module-api?
- Do not leak Slick module interfaces into Laravel domain code. Create adapters that implement or consume the required Slick contracts and translate them into Laravel service providers, container bindings, and application events. Treat the package as a boundary contract, not a core framework dependency, and test the adapter with one representative module lifecycle.
- What are alternatives to slick/module-api for Laravel modularization?
- For Laravel-first code, use Laravel-native package structure with service providers, package discovery, container bindings, config publishing, and events. If you need modularization patterns, evaluate maintained Laravel ecosystem approaches rather than a Slick contract package with zero dependents. If interoperability with Slick is unavoidable, vendor or wrap slick/module-api behind internal interfaces and plan a replacement path.
Weaver
How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?