roxblnfk/unpoly
Laravel package for integrating Unpoly into your app. Adds helpers and assets to enable fast, progressive page updates, partial reloads, and smoother navigation without building a full SPA, while keeping standard routes and controllers.
This package appears to be a misnamed or misunderstood polyfill-cleanup utility—not an Unpoly integration. Despite its description claiming "Unpoly support", the repository name roxblnfk/unpoly, description ("Remove PHP-XX polyfill"), and score (0.365) suggest it’s either an abandoned experiment, a typo, or a non-functional placeholder. Do not use it for Unpoly integration. For actual Unpoly in Laravel:
<body data-unpoly-target> or use community packages like laravel-unpoly (if verified and maintained).composer show roxblnfk/unpoly --strict — if unknown, skip.If you do confirm this package is functional and intentional (unlikely):
composer show -i | grep polyfill → verify what needs removal.# In `composer.json` scripts (post-autoload-dump, NOT post-update-cmd)
"post-autoload-dump": ["@php vendor/bin/unpoly --only=php-7.4"]
unpoly --dry-run (if implemented).composer.lock committedcomposer why symfony/polyfill-* may break dependencies (e.g., Laravel 10+ still uses some php80-* polyfills on PHP 7.4)unpoly may corrupt vendor/composer/installed.json or autoload_files.php if it manipulates Composer’s autoloader incorrectlysymfony/polyfill with version-specific packages onlycomposer remove php-7.4-polyfill --no-update && composer update --with-all-dependenciesrequire-dev onlyunpoly --check && exit $? to fail fastcomposer.lock changes in PRs fully reviewed💡 Rule of thumb: If the package doesn’t have 100+ stars, a GitHub repo, and clear usage docs, don’t use it—polyfill hygiene is too critical to gamble on unknown code.
How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?