Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message
Starter Kit

Starter Kit Laravel Package

rockero-cz/starter-kit

A Laravel starter kit by rockero-cz that scaffolds a new application with a preconfigured foundation, letting developers skip repetitive setup and start building features faster. It provides a clean base structure and sensible defaults for maintainable Laravel projects.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Speed up the kickoff of your Laravel projects.

Frequently asked questions about Starter Kit
Is rockero-cz/starter-kit a Composer package I can install with composer require?
No. It is a starter kit, not a library, so it is not consumed via composer require. You clone or fork the repository once at the start of a new project and then own that copy permanently. That means no runtime dependency, no dependency resolution, and no upgrade surface imposed on your applications.
Which Laravel and PHP versions does rockero-cz/starter-kit support?
The last release was 2024-10-07, so it targets whatever Laravel and PHP combination was current at that time. The kit does not publish an explicit upgrade cadence, so check the pinned versions in composer.json against your own runtime before adopting. Because Laravel ships majors roughly annually, expect to test and bump versions yourself.
How do I install or get started with rockero-cz/starter-kit?
Clone the repository, run composer install and the usual Laravel setup steps such as copying .env, generating an app key, and running migrations, then strip out anything you do not need. A half-day spike to provision a throwaway service and diff the kit against laravel/laravel is the fastest way to see exactly what it adds. Only after that should you consider registering it as an internal template.
Can I add rockero-cz/starter-kit to an existing Laravel application?
No, it is greenfield-only and there is effectively no migration path into an existing app. Retrofitting a full template usually costs more than writing the feature directly. If you want value from it in an existing codebase, treat it as a donor repository and cherry-pick individual pieces such as its Docker setup or CI workflows.
What does the starter kit include out of the box?
It scaffolds a Laravel application with a preconfigured foundation and sensible defaults, but the full inventory of pre-wired packages must be confirmed by auditing composer.json and the repository. Typical items to check are auth scaffolding, admin panel, Docker or Sail, CI provider, static analysis, testing stack, and queue or websocket layers. Also confirm its own test suite passes on a clean clone, because every included package inherits into every downstream repository.
Does the starter kit use Blade, Livewire, Inertia, Vue, or React?
The frontend opinion is not clearly documented in the overview, and it is the most expensive axis to get wrong. Confirm it by inspecting resources/, package.json, and the auth and routing setup before committing. A frontend mismatch is woven through scaffolding rather than isolated in config, so it is not cheaply swappable.
Is rockero-cz/starter-kit actively maintained?
It has a single maintainer, no visible contributor base, and a last release of 2024-10-07, with around 32 stars at the time of evaluation. There is no stated deprecation policy or security disclosure process. Treat it as a well-intentioned personal starter kit rather than a community-governed template.
What are the production risks of building on this starter kit?
The main risks appear after adoption: upstream template drift, merge conflicts, and falling behind Laravel major versions. Teams that patch their own forks without tracking upstream typically end up with several divergent variants within a couple of quarters. Budget time for version bumps and keep your diff against laravel/laravel small.
How do I keep my fork in sync with Laravel and the upstream kit?
Add the upstream laravel/laravel skeleton as a remote and periodically diff it against your tree, so you know what changed in config defaults, bootstrap code, and middleware wiring each cycle. For the kit itself, decide upfront whether you track its upstream or deliberately freeze it. Keeping your own modifications isolated and minimal makes either choice cheaper.
What are the alternatives to this Laravel starter kit?
The official Laravel skeleton plus Breeze, Jetstream, or the Laravel installer's starter kits cover most of the same ground with stronger maintenance guarantees. Sail, Pint, and published CI templates can supply the infrastructure opinions without adopting an entire tree. Many teams build and own an internal template instead of depending on a single-maintainer kit.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
novasa/laravel-language-center
opencage/geocode
adolfoholzer/parameters
livenetworks/ln-starter
shitoudev/permissionmanager
johannesclimacus/laravel-tui
hocvt/seotools
vitalybaev/sypexgeo
amphibee/themosis-ignition
gito-me/fast-excel
frankyso/laravel-ipaymu
geolize-studio/laravel-chile
boomerangui/chat
jinas/dhivatar
store-doc/laravel-storage-driver
plus-it/laravel-translation-manager
diephp/perhaps
diephp/telegraph
osmaviation/spreadsheet
microsoft/fluentui-system-icons