Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Formulate Laravel Package

rezzza/formulate

rezzza/formulate is a Laravel form-building package that lets you declare fields, validation, and layout in PHP, then render clean HTML forms and bind data to models. It helps keep form markup and rules centralized and reusable across your app.

Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Feature enablement — configurable business logic. A formula/expression engine lets you ship "user-editable math" once (pricing tiers, commission splits, tax and premium calculations, lead-scoring, KPI/derived metrics, dynamic form fields) instead of a code change and deploy per rule tweak. That is a product capability decision — who owns the numbers — not just a library choice.
  • Build vs. buy vs. borrow. This package is only a credible answer to the "borrow" option: MIT-licensed, small, and readable, so it works as a reference implementation or fork candidate for the parsing/evaluation layer. It is not a "buy and forget" dependency at 12 stars, no release since 2016, and a 0.28 health score.
  • Scope boundary for the roadmap. Adopting a 2016-era expression evaluator effectively freezes you at PHP 5.6/7.x semantics and gives you no security posture for evaluating user-supplied formulas. If formulas will be authored by customers or tenants, that is a security and audit decision, and it should push you toward a maintained, sandbox-capable engine rather than this one.
  • Use cases it genuinely maps to: internal pricing/quotation calculators, insurance or lending premium estimators, scoring/ranking rules, payroll and invoicing line-item math, derived-metric definitions in reporting, and "advanced mode" fields where a power user enters an expression.
  • Use cases it does not support: money math requiring decimal precision and unit safety, compliance/audit-trailed rule evaluation, or anything you'd have to explain to a security reviewer.

PM recommendation: fund a 1–2 day spike to validate the capability (formula-driven rules behind your own FormulaEngine interface), not a commitment to this package.

When to Consider This Package

Consider it when:

  • You need a formula DSL for a prototype, internal tool, hackathon, or one-off script, and shipping in days matters more than longevity.
  • You are on a legacy PHP 5.6/7.x stack that already pins old dependencies, so its age adds no new risk.
  • You want a compact, readable example of tokenizing/parsing/evaluating math expressions to inform your own implementation or a fork.
  • You will wrap it behind your own abstraction so it can be replaced without touching product code.

Look elsewhere when:

  • You target PHP 8.x or need an actively maintained dependency with security advisories — this project has had no release since May 2016 and effectively no maintainer (bus factor ≈ 1, tiny user base).
  • End users or tenants author the formulas — you need sandboxing, timeouts, allow-listed functions, and rate limits; do not hand-roll this around an unmaintained evaluator.
  • You need money-grade precision, units, localization of number formats, or deterministic rounding.
  • You want Laravel-native integration — there is no service provider, facade, config, or queue/cache integration here; you would write that glue yourself.
  • Your rules are complex enough to want a rules engine (decision tables, chained rules, explainability) rather than a single expression evaluator.

Practical alternative to evaluate in the same spike: symfony/expression-language (maintained, registerable functions, cacheable parsed expressions, works fine inside Laravel) — and keep this package as the design reference.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

To executives: "We can let the business change pricing, scoring, and fee rules without an engineering release — the engine evaluates a formula instead of us hardcoding each rule. That shortens the loop from a pricing decision to a shipped change from days to minutes. The specific open-source package we found is a 2016 artifact with a tiny user base and no maintainer, so I'm recommending we validate the capability with a short spike and adopt a maintained engine underneath our own interface — same product outcome, without betting the roadmap on an abandoned dependency."

To engineering: "rezzza/formulate is a small MIT PHP library for building and evaluating math expressions — useful as a spec and a fork candidate, not as a dependency: no Laravel bindings, no PHP 8 support, no releases in ~9 years. Proposal: define a thin FormulaEngine contract in our domain, backed initially by symfony/expression-language; allow-list functions, validate variable names, cache parsed expressions, and never eval() user input. This package's API informs the contract; it does not ship to production."

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
pharaonic/laravel-notification-dependencies
beautinow/translug
dev-brainiac/bot-cloaked
octoberrain/html
octoberrain/extension
octoberrain/exception
octoberrain/contracts
frankyso/ipaymu
3mdikram/worldmoneywords
snowsoft/config
itmosoft/laravel-subscriptions
larva/laravel-ai-qwen
adachsoft/api-version-bundle
cgv/localized-resource
noith/settings
kda/laravel-package
kda/filament-dynamic-navigation
bypersoft/signbox
pairus/product-data
fayne/laravel-filament-cms-core