- Is quef/team-bundle a Laravel package or a Symfony bundle?
- The name and repository layout strongly suggest a Symfony bundle rather than a Laravel package. It uses the Bundle naming convention and lacks the service provider and config/src layout Laravel developers expect. The evaluation recommends confirming by reading composer.json for symfony/framework-bundle or doctrine/orm before assuming any Laravel compatibility.
- How do I install quef/team-bundle in Laravel?
- There is no documented installation path, so a standard composer require is not enough to assume it works. Laravel auto-discovery relies on extra.laravel.providers, which a Symfony-style bundle will not declare. You would need to write a service provider, alias container bindings, and possibly build an adapter layer for framework-coupled code.
- Does quef/team-bundle support Laravel 10 or 11?
- There is no evidence of tested Laravel version support, no tagged releases surfaced, and no dependents reporting compatibility. The technical evaluation treats framework support as unknown, not merely low. Confirm the declared php and framework constraints in composer.json before spending integration time.
- Does quef/team-bundle use Eloquent or Doctrine for persistence?
- The package name points to a Symfony bundle, which typically pairs with Doctrine ORM rather than Laravel's Eloquent. The evaluation explicitly flags Doctrine versus Eloquent as an unresolved architectural question. If it requires doctrine/orm, it does not fit cleanly into an Eloquent application without significant adaptation.
- Is quef/team-bundle safe to use in production?
- The evaluation recommends against adopting it as a dependency in any production system. It has zero stars, zero dependents, no visible maintenance activity, and no audit trail, which is a supply-chain governance concern. Team and membership logic also carries authorization risk, so unread domain code is especially dangerous.
- Does quef/team-bundle have tests and tagged releases?
- No tagged releases were surfaced and there is no documented test suite. The recommended first step is a time-boxed spike to clone the repository, inspect composer.json, confirm the license, and check whether tests run on your PHP version. Without that evidence, feasibility is unknown rather than proven.
- What are good alternatives to quef/team-bundle for team management in Laravel?
- The evaluation suggests a maintained, widely adopted package such as a Spatie or Laravel-native authorization package. A small in-house domain module is also preferable when team, membership, and role logic is core to your product. Either option gives you clearer maintenance, testing, and security expectations than an unproven bundle.
- Who maintains quef/team-bundle and is it still active?
- The vendor is effectively anonymous and there is no visible commit activity in the assessment. Zero dependents and no release history strongly imply the package is abandoned or dormant. That means future PHP and Laravel major-version bumps become your team's problem.
- Can I use quef/team-bundle for roles, permissions, and invitations?
- The package advertises membership handling and role structures, but the actual domain behavior is undocumented and unverified. Team packages encode subtle authorization logic such as cascade deletes, role inheritance, and tenancy scoping. A defect there is an authorization incident, so you must read the full source before relying on it.
- What license does quef/team-bundle use, and can I fork it?
- The license is not confirmed in the available information, and the evaluation lists it as a key question to answer before further investment. Forking is likely if you need to adapt the code, but only a confirmed permissive license makes that viable. Check the LICENSE file and composer.json license field before building on it.