Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Intercept Laravel Package

promptphp/intercept

PromptPHP Intercept is a Laravel package for capturing, inspecting, and modifying AI prompts and responses before they reach LLM providers, with middleware-style hooks for logging, redaction, caching, and testing.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • AI feature build-out on Laravel: Intercept sits alongside laravel/ai and gives teams a seam to intercept, inspect, and stub model calls. This directly supports roadmap decisions like "can we add an AI assistant / summarization / classification feature without rewriting our test and observability story?"
  • Build vs. buy for AI plumbing: Rather than building in-house interception/mocking layers around every LLM call, teams can adopt Intercept to standardize how prompts, responses, and side effects are captured across the app. Use it as the reference layer before deciding to invest in custom tooling.
  • Testing and cost-control strategy: If the product depends on paid model calls, Intercept's interception model supports a testing posture where CI never hits a live provider — a direct lever on both reliability and run-rate.
  • Observability roadmap: A consistent intercept point makes it feasible to add logging, audit trails, prompt/response capture, and failure handling as product requirements mature, without touching every call site.
  • v1.0.0 as a stability checkpoint: The 1.0 milestone signals an API the team can plan a year-long roadmap against, and is the right moment to decide whether AI interception becomes a platform-level concern or stays feature-local.

When to Consider This Package

Adopt when:

  • The product is a Laravel app using laravel/ai — Intercept is designed around that dependency, so fit is near-zero-friction.
  • You need to test AI-driven features deterministically (fake responses, assert prompts, simulate failures) as part of normal PHPUnit/Pest suites.
  • You want a single interception layer for logging, redaction, retries, or cost tracking across multiple AI call sites.
  • You are pre-1.0 in your AI feature and want a lightweight, framework-native seam rather than adopting a full LLM observability SaaS.
  • You value ecosystem alignment — being on the same laravel/ai family as the rest of your stack reduces integration surprises.

Look elsewhere when:

  • You are not on laravel/ai (e.g., direct OpenAI/Anthropic SDKs, other frameworks, or non-Laravel services) — Intercept's value is largely scoped to that ecosystem.
  • You need production-grade, vendor-supported observability (distributed tracing, dashboards, SLAs, on-call support). Intercept complements, but does not replace, APM/LLM-ops platforms, and the dependency pin below is a signal of a relatively young package rather than a hardened enterprise offering.
  • You require formal support contracts, security review artifacts, or LTS guarantees — the release cadence here (documentation bot commits dominating the changelog) suggests a small team, so plan your own vendor risk assessment.
  • The laravel/ai <1.0 pin is a blocker for your environment — note that Intercept constrains laravel/ai to pre-1.0. If your org is standardizing on laravel/ai 1.0+, you inherit a version conflict until Intercept bumps its constraint.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For executives: Intercept gives our Laravel engineering team a stable (v1.0.0) way to test and monitor the AI features we're planning to ship, without paying for live model calls in test environments or building custom tooling from scratch. It is a small, targeted dependency rather than a strategic platform commitment, and it de-risks AI roadmap items by giving us a clean interception layer for logging, cost tracking, and failure handling. The main caveat is that it currently pins laravel/ai below 1.0, so if we standardize on a later version we will depend on the maintainer's release cadence.

For engineering leads: v1.0.0 is an API-stability marker, and the release notes are dominated by docs and a dependency constraint fix rather than new behavior. That is a healthy sign — the surface is settling. Adopt it as the standard seam for AI calls in Laravel so interception logic lives in one place; keep an eye on the laravel/ai <1.0 pin as a tracking item, and treat the small contributor base as a maintenance risk to monitor rather than a reason to avoid adoption.

For engineering: Drop-in with laravel/ai; use it to fake model responses in tests, assert on prompts, and centralize logging/redaction. Watch the laravel/ai version constraint when upgrading that dependency.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
store-doc/laravel-storage-driver
plus-it/laravel-translation-manager
diephp/perhaps
diephp/telegraph
osmaviation/spreadsheet
microsoft/fluentui-system-icons
mmccook/php-json-canonicalization-scheme
middlewares/firewall
qubiqx/montapacking
nyoncode/laravel-package-console
pnscripts/filament-broadquill-lite
pnscripts/laravel-sentfold-lite
vleap/mx-sdk-laravel-internal
twidpay/utils
htetmyathlaing/scout-elasticsearch-driver
artisan-toolbox/front-awesome
ls/client-assistant
users-au/laravel-client
cgv/localized-resource
noith/settings