Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Ux Editor Laravel Package

pentiminax/ux-editor

pentiminax/ux-editor bundles a ready-to-use rich-text/WYSIWYG editor with PHP form integration, letting you add a configurable editor field to your forms, manage its assets, and customize toolbars with minimal setup.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Editor.js integration for Symfony

Frequently asked questions about Ux Editor
Is pentiminax/ux-editor a Laravel package or a Symfony package?
The repository describes pentiminax/ux-editor as Editor.js integration for Symfony, while the technical evaluation assesses it as a Laravel-style package with a service provider and publishable assets and config. That mismatch matters, so confirm the framework target and the real composer.json requirements before committing. For a Laravel application, treat it as an unverified UI dependency until a spike proves it installs, boots, and renders.
How do I install pentiminax/ux-editor in a Laravel app?
Install with an exact version constraint, for example composer require pentiminax/ux-editor:0.1.2, then publish any config and frontend assets and rebuild with Vite or your asset pipeline. Do not use a caret constraint, because patch releases have already shipped behavioural changes. Run the publish step on a scratch branch first so you can inspect exactly which files land in your application.
Which Laravel and PHP versions does this Editor.js package support?
The package is pre-1.0 at v0.1.2, and no CI matrix against Laravel 10, 11, or 12 or PHP 8.2 or 8.3 is documented in the material reviewed. Early-stage packages often target a narrow version range, so read the composer.json constraints before installing. If your project runs an untested combination, budget time for a spike or pick a more established editor integration.
Why should I pin 0.1.2 instead of using a caret constraint?
Pinning 0.1.2 protects you from a pattern already observed: v0.1.2 removed package-side ID generation as a patch-level bump from 0.1.1. Pre-1.0 semver permits that churn, but a caret constraint would pull in future patch releases that may break again. Pin the exact version and review the diff manually on every upgrade.
What changed with ID generation in v0.1.2?
In v0.1.1 the package apparently generated element or node IDs itself, and v0.1.2 removes that responsibility. The changelog does not clarify whether the removal covered server-rendered element IDs, client-side block IDs, or both. If your code relied on package-generated IDs for anchors, DOM targeting, or persisted output, expect a break on a patch bump. Verify the actual behaviour in a spike rather than assuming a fallback exists.
How should I generate and store editor block IDs now?
You now own ID assignment, so design it deliberately: deterministic IDs derived from your own data, collision handling, and stability across save and load round-trips. Implement this in a thin application-level adapter, such as a Blade or Livewire component, rather than scattering ID logic through views. Test the round-trip explicitly by saving, reloading, and asserting that the IDs come back unchanged.
Does it work with Livewire, Inertia, or plain Blade?
It is a presentation-layer dependency, so it should sit behind a Blade component or a Livewire or Inertia wrapper that owns ID assignment, serialization, and validation. The package expects a modern frontend build such as Vite, and the underlying editor may need a JavaScript framework bridge. Keep the package API out of domain and service classes so you can swap it later.
Who handles saving and validating editor content?
The package does not manage persistence, authorization, or validation, so your application must store the editor output and validate it server-side. Editor.js produces structured JSON, so validate the block schema and sanitize any rendered HTML before display. Treat the editor as untrusted input exactly like any other rich-text field in your forms.
Is pentiminax/ux-editor production ready?
Treat it as early-stage: v0.1.x, a small PR count, and a likely single maintainer mean bus factor and long-term support are unproven. Run a time-boxed spike in a non-critical admin screen rather than a production rollout. Reassess if release cadence, migration notes, and test coverage remain undocumented.
How do I test an Editor.js integration in Laravel?
Write feature tests that post editor JSON to your endpoint and assert the stored structure plus validation errors, and add a round-trip test that checks ID stability after reload. Use Laravel Dusk or a JavaScript test runner if the editor client behaviour matters. Pin 0.1.2 in CI so a silent patch upgrade cannot change results between runs.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
jinas/dhivatar
store-doc/laravel-storage-driver
plus-it/laravel-translation-manager
diephp/perhaps
diephp/telegraph
osmaviation/spreadsheet
microsoft/fluentui-system-icons
mmccook/php-json-canonicalization-scheme
middlewares/firewall
qubiqx/montapacking
nyoncode/laravel-package-console
pnscripts/filament-broadquill-lite
pnscripts/laravel-sentfold-lite
vleap/mx-sdk-laravel-internal
twidpay/utils
htetmyathlaing/scout-elasticsearch-driver
artisan-toolbox/front-awesome
ls/client-assistant
users-au/laravel-client
cgv/localized-resource