Weave Code
Symfony Laravel Package
papi-ai/symfony
Symfony bundle for Papi AI that simplifies client configuration and lets you access AI capabilities from services and controllers through Symfony’s dependency injection.
Symfony bridge for PapiAI
Frequently asked questions about Symfony
- What is papi-ai/symfony and is it a Laravel package?
- papi-ai/symfony is a Symfony bundle and bridge for PapiAI that simplifies client configuration and exposes AI capabilities through Symfony dependency injection in services and controllers. It is not described as a Laravel-specific package, but it is Composer-managed, so Laravel teams may evaluate it when sharing PHP AI tooling. The available release context focuses on Symfony integration and papi-core compatibility, not Laravel service-provider features.
- How do I install papi-ai/symfony with Composer?
- Install it with Composer and make sure papi-core >=0.15.3 can resolve, because that is the dependency floor for papi-ai/symfony v0.15.1. Use a constrained Composer update rather than a broad dependency refresh, then verify bundle registration and configuration according to the repository README. The release note itself is mainly dependency hygiene and does not document a new installation flow.
- Which Laravel and PHP versions are supported by papi-ai/symfony?
- The provided release context does not specify a complete Laravel or PHP support matrix. It does indicate that v0.15.1 requires papi-core >=0.15.3 to pick up PHP 8.5 fixes. Check the package composer.json, README, and CI test matrix before assuming support for a specific Laravel or PHP version.
- Does papi-ai/symfony work with Laravel's dependency injection?
- The package is described as a Symfony bundle that uses Symfony dependency injection to access AI capabilities from services and controllers. The available context does not describe a Laravel service provider, facade, or Laravel container integration. Laravel developers should confirm the integration approach before adopting it in a Laravel application.
- What changed in papi-ai/symfony v0.15.1?
- v0.15.1 is best treated as dependency maintenance: it requires papi-core >=0.15.3 so the package picks up PHP 8.5 fixes. No architectural change or feature release is signaled in the assessment. Its value is improved compatibility and PHP 8.5 readiness, not a strategic capability upgrade.
- Is papi-core a direct or transitive dependency of papi-ai/symfony?
- The assessment says v0.15.1 requires papi-core >=0.15.3 but does not clarify whether papi-core is a direct or transitive dependency. Inspect composer.json and the lockfile to confirm how it is declared and constrained. This matters because existing lockfiles pinned below the new floor will fail resolution until updated.
- How do I resolve Composer conflicts with papi-core >=0.15.3?
- Identify other packages that constrain papi-core below 0.15.3, then run a constrained Composer update for papi-ai/symfony and papi-core instead of refreshing unrelated dependencies. Update the lockfile in a branch and run unit, integration, and smoke tests before promotion. Promote through staging or a canary and retain a rollback lockfile.
- Is papi-ai/symfony production-ready on PHP 8.5?
- v0.15.1 improves PHP 8.5 readiness by requiring papi-core >=0.15.3, but the available context does not confirm complete test coverage or that PHP 8.5 is a near-term production target. Validate against your production PHP version and review the papi-core changelog for behavior changes. Because the package remains on a 0.x line, do not assume API stability.
- What testing should I run before upgrading papi-ai/symfony?
- Test Composer resolution, bundle registration, configuration loading, dependency injection wiring, and actual AI client calls from services or controllers. Run normal unit, integration, and smoke tests, including the PHP 8.5 path if that is a target. A staged rollout with a rollback lockfile reduces risk from transitive dependency conflicts.
- How is papi-ai/symfony maintained and what are the main risks?
- Ongoing maintenance appears low, but the package is still on a 0.x line, so version pinning and changelog review are required. The main technical risk is transitive dependency conflict rather than an announced breaking API change. Support effort is mostly dependency-resolution support, and no scaling impact is indicated by the release note.
Weaver
How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?