Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Layout Cache Laravel Package

oro/layout-cache

A lightweight Laravel/PHP package for caching rendered layouts and view fragments, reducing repeated rendering overhead and speeding up page responses with simple, configurable cache behavior.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Storefront performance strategy for OroCommerce. This bundle is the render cache layer for OroCommerce storefront layouts — the mechanism that lets composed layout blocks be cached and reused instead of rebuilt per request. That makes it a lever for TTFB, time-to-first-render, and origin load during catalog browsing, not a standalone product feature.
  • Build vs. buy (answered: buy the platform, don't build this). Layout render caching is a solved, platform-provided concern in OroCommerce. The real decision is whether to standardize on OroCommerce's caching model and invest in configuration, warmup, and invalidation strategy — not whether to write your own layout cache.
  • Roadmap inputs for scaling and merchandising velocity. Layout composition is where marketing/CMS-style page changes land. Cache TTL, invalidation on layout publish, and per-scope variance directly bound how fast merchandisers can ship page changes without a performance regression — a genuine roadmap trade-off between content agility and cache hit rate.
  • Cache-scope product requirements. Layout output varies by website, localization, customer group, and sometimes per-customer pricing/visibility. Deciding which scopes are cacheable is a product decision (personalization depth vs. performance and infrastructure cost), and this package is the implementation surface for it.
  • Platform audit / tech-debt triage. For an existing OroCommerce estate, this is an artifact to inventory when assessing upgrade risk and dependency health, not a component to select.

Note for framing: despite the brief, this is a Symfony bundle for OroCommerce (OroPlatform), not a Laravel package. It has no relevance to a Laravel codebase.

When to Consider This Package

Consider it only when:

  • You are already running OroCommerce/OroPlatform and need to understand, tune, or fork the storefront layout render cache.
  • You need to trace what is actually cached, at what scope, and when it is invalidated — useful input for a caching/invalidation design review or an upgrade impact assessment.
  • You are evaluating whether a performance issue originates in layout composition versus the rest of the request pipeline.

Look elsewhere when:

  • Your stack is Laravel, or Symfony outside OroPlatform. There is no meaningful reuse here; the bundle is coupled to Oro's layout, config, and entity model.
  • You need a maintained dependency. Last release 2020-09-11, zero stars, zero dependents — this is vendored platform internals, not a community-supported library. No security patching, no PHP/runtime compatibility guarantees for current versions.
  • License is unresolved. NOASSERTION means the declared terms could not be machine-identified. That is a blocker for any commercial redistribution or embedded use until legal clears it against Oro's actual licensing for the version you run.
  • You need per-request personalization at scale — layout caching is the wrong primitive for that; look at edge/CDN and fragment-level strategies instead.

If you proceed: pin to the exact version shipped with your OroCommerce release, treat it as read-only platform code, and fork internally if you must patch. Do not adopt it as an independent dependency.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For executives: This is not a strategic dependency and not a commercial opportunity — it is plumbing inside OroCommerce that caches rendered storefront layouts. Its value is entirely indirect: it is one of the levers behind storefront page speed and infrastructure cost as catalog and personalization grow. The artifact itself is unmaintained (last release 2020) and has no community or usage footprint, so we should not build a plan around it. The decision that matters is our caching and personalization policy — how much per-customer variation we allow versus how much we cache — because that drives both page speed and hosting cost. If we are on OroCommerce, that policy is configured through this layer; if we are not, this package is irrelevant to us.

For engineering: Treat oro/layout-cache as read-only OroPlatform internals, not a library to adopt. Constraints to respect: released 2020, zero dependents, license is NOASSERTION (needs legal confirmation against the Oro release you actually run), and it is coupled to Oro's layout/config model — do not attempt to lift it into a Laravel or standalone Symfony app. Recommended actions: (1) inventory the version currently vendored and confirm it matches your OroCommerce release; (2) document the cache scopes and invalidation triggers in place today, since that is the real operational risk; (3) if a patch is required, fork and track it internally with an explicit owner; (4) validate against your target PHP/runtime before any upgrade. Do not add it as a new dependency, and do not expect upstream fixes.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
coleus/frame
thtg88/journalism
filagora/filagora-ai-forums
rlacerda83/query-parser
socialdept/atp-orm
cboxdk/laravel-assistant-client
socialdept/atp-resolver
socialdept/tenant-domains
tautvydasr/blade-class-names
socialdept/color-scales
maherelgamil/controller
coleus/widgets
coleus/table
coleus/users
coleus/music
coleus/health
coleus/calendar
coleus/notes
coleus/support
coleus/settings