Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Cms Laravel Package

orchid/cms

Orchid is a Laravel package for rapidly building admin panels and CMS-style backends. It offers screens, flexible layouts, form fields, filters, and CRUD tooling, letting developers create rich, data-driven management interfaces with minimal boilerplate.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Press package for Orchid Platform

Frequently asked questions about Cms
What is orchid/cms and how does it relate to the orchidcommunity/press repository?
orchid/cms is the descriptive name for the Press package, a domain module for Orchid Platform rather than a standalone CMS. The repository is orchidcommunity/press, so you should confirm which Composer package name is actually installed before adding it. It contributes posts, categories, media, and publishing state as Orchid Screens and Eloquent models inside an existing Orchid admin panel.
How do I install Orchid Press in an existing Laravel application?
You install it with Composer, publish its migrations and configuration, register the service provider, and run the migrations. The package creates its own tables and adds screens to the Orchid admin menu without external services or queue workers. Timebox a spike to confirm it installs and renders against your target Orchid, Laravel, and PHP versions before planning further work.
Does Orchid Press provide public routes and frontend rendering for a blog?
No. It lives at the admin-UI layer and expects your host Laravel application to own public routing, controllers, views, caching, and rendering. You will need to build the delivery layer yourself, including any SEO concerns such as slugs, canonicals, and sitemaps. Treat Press as an admin-side content module, not a complete frontend CMS.
Which Laravel, PHP, and Orchid Platform versions does Orchid Press support?
The supported version matrix is not clearly maintained, and Orchid has introduced breaking changes to its Screen and field APIs across majors. A package with no visible adoption is unlikely to track the current Orchid release. Check composer.json constraints, the last commit date, and run an install spike against your exact Laravel, PHP, and Orchid versions.
Is orchidcommunity/press safe to use as a production dependency?
The main risk is abandonment rather than code quality: it has zero stars, zero dependents, and no evident production usage or security disclosure channel. That matters because it runs inside the admin panel, the highest-privilege surface of the application, handling rich text and uploads. The safer posture is to evaluate it as a reference implementation or fork candidate, not a supported vendor dependency.
Can I extend the Orchid Press content model with custom fields, taxonomies, or localization?
The content model appears oriented around a fixed post schema, and extensibility for custom fields, taxonomies, i18n, revisions, and scheduling is not clearly documented. You should inspect the Eloquent models and Orchid Screen definitions to see how hardcoded the fields are. If your requirements diverge, plan to fork and maintain the package or build a custom module.
How does Orchid Press handle media uploads, and can I use S3 or another filesystem disk?
Media handling is not clearly abstracted and may assume local disk storage, which is a common limitation in small admin modules. Verify whether uploads and image fields use Laravel's filesystem abstraction before committing to S3 or other remote disks. If they do not, you will need to patch the field and model code or add a custom storage adapter.
Does Orchid Press work with Filament, Nova, Statamic, or a plain Blade admin panel?
No. Press is built specifically for Orchid Platform and depends on Orchid Screen classes and field DSL declarations. It is not a fit for Filament, Nova, Statamic, or plain Blade admin stacks. In those environments, compare a purpose-built CMS or an in-house CRUD module instead of shortlisting Orchid Press.
Does Orchid Press ship tests, and how should I verify it on my stack?
Test coverage is unverified from the package metadata, so do not assume the suite exists or passes on current versions. Start with an install spike that loads the screens and performs a create, edit, upload, and publish flow. Then run any included tests and add your own smoke tests around the admin routes before relying on it.
What is the best alternative to adopting Orchid Press?
Within an existing Orchid application, the practical alternative is a small in-house blog module built with Orchid Screens and Eloquent models, which typically takes one to two weeks. Forking Press as a starting point can save that time if you accept maintenance ownership. Outside Orchid, use a purpose-built CMS or your framework's native admin tooling instead.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
users-au/socialite-provider
twidpay/twid-logger
mrnewport/laravel-plaid
mrnewport/laravel-repo
mrnewport/laravel-docsign
mrnewport/laravel-stow
mrnewport/laravel-flow
mrnewport/laravel-priceable
mrnewport/laravel-nestedterms
fredmeng/laravel-apidoc-generator
itstructure/laravel-multilingual-tools
pdustdar/elasticsearch
markupai/php-sdk
rlacerda83/lumem-microservice-shipment
uni-method/symfony-lib
tacticmedia/scim-server-bundle
neika-ai/symfony-bundle
mattleads/agent-publishing-bundle
glavweb/framework-bundle
glavweb/extra-bundle