Http Laravel Package

Technical Evaluation

Architecture fit is poor for Laravel projects due to fundamental incompatibility with Laravel's Symfony-based HTTP stack. Laravel's symfony/http-foundation provides identical functionality with deeper framework integration, making nette/http redundant. Integration feasibility is low—Laravel's middleware, routing, and DI systems expect Symfony-compatible request/response objects, and nette/http's objects would require extensive adapter layers. Technical risk is high: potential security gaps from inconsistent sanitization between stacks, session handling conflicts, and unpredictable behavior in edge cases (e.g., proxy handling). Key questions: Why replace Laravel's battle-tested HTTP layer? How would session state be synchronized between two competing session managers? Are there specific nette/http features missing in Symfony's implementation? (Unlikely, as Symfony covers all standard HTTP needs comprehensively.)

Integration Approach

Stack fit is nonexistent—Laravel's entire ecosystem (middleware, controllers, validation) is built on Symfony's Request/Response interfaces. Migration path is infeasible; forcing nette/http into Laravel would require rewriting core framework components and breaking all existing middleware. Compatibility is zero: nette/http's Request class doesn't implement Symfony's RequestInterface, causing fatal errors when passed to Laravel's system. Sequencing is irrelevant—no valid