Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Laravel Paystack Laravel Package

myckhel/laravel-paystack

A Laravel package that wraps the Paystack payment API, letting you accept payments, verify transactions, manage customers and plans, and handle webhooks through a clean, fluent interface. Supports cards, bank transfers, USSD, and subscriptions.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Payment provider strategy (build vs. buy vs. wrapper). This package is the "buy the glue, keep the provider" option: you commit to Paystack as the processor while avoiding a bespoke HTTP client, auth handling, and webhook plumbing in your own codebase. The PM decision is really two-layered — provider selection (Paystack vs. Stripe/Flutterwave/Paddle, driven by market coverage, pricing, and settlement currency) and integration approach (this wrapper vs. direct SDK vs. in-house client).
  • Market/geo expansion roadmap. Paystack's core footprint (Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa) means this package is effectively an enabler for launching in those markets. v1.6.0's Terminal and Virtual Terminal support extends the addressable use case from online checkout to assisted and in-person payments — agent/phone-order capture, field sales, and physical POS. That is a roadmap-level unlock, not just a technical nicety: it lets one provider cover both your e-commerce flow and your offline/assisted-sales flow, reducing vendor sprawl.
  • Order API support → new product surfaces. Order/invoice-style payment requests open up B2B invoicing, partial payments, and "pay by link" flows that would otherwise need a separate tooling purchase. Worth evaluating against your billing roadmap before building anything custom.
  • Platform upgrade cadence. Laravel 13 / PHP 8.4 support in CI and dependency constraints is a risk-reduction signal: it de-risks your own framework upgrade planning and lowers the chance of a dependency conflict forcing an early fork or replacement. Favorable input to "keep the current stack, schedule the upgrade."
  • Prioritisation input. Feature coverage now spans transactions, terminal, virtual terminal, and orders — enough surface area that a PM can sequence use cases (online checkout first, in-person second) without re-litigating the provider decision each time.

When to Consider This Package

Adopt when:

  • Paystack is already (or is being seriously considered as) your processor, and you want a thin, idiomatic Laravel binding rather than provider-specific code scattered across your app.
  • You are on, or planning to move to, Laravel 12/13 and PHP 8.3/8.4 — v1.6.0 explicitly tracks that.
  • You need both online and assisted/in-person payment flows (Terminal, Virtual Terminal) from a single provider integration.
  • Your team is small and the cost of owning webhook verification, retries, and API versioning in-house is not justified.

Look elsewhere / apply extra diligence when:

  • Single-maintainer risk matters. This is a community package (recent work is one contributor). For a revenue-critical path, plan for either a paid support option, a fork-and-own contingency, or direct SDK usage with a thin internal abstraction.
  • You need contractual SLAs or vendor support — go direct to Paystack's official SDKs or a commercially supported integration.
  • Multi-provider routing/fallback is a requirement. Wrappers like this optimise for one provider; if you need automatic failover across processors, budget for an abstraction layer above it.
  • Feature completeness is unverified. The v1.6.0 note is truncated ("Terminal, Virtual Terminal, and Order API integ…"); confirm which endpoints are actually covered versus still requiring raw API calls before committing roadmap scope to them.
  • You operate outside Paystack's supported markets — the package is fine technically, but the provider choice is the blocker.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For executives: We can keep Paystack as our payment provider and pick up two capabilities we'd otherwise have to build or buy separately — in-person/assisted payments (Terminal and Virtual Terminal) and invoice-style payment requests (Order API) — by taking a minor version upgrade of an integration library we already depend on. The release also adds Laravel 13 and PHP 8.4 support, which removes a blocker from our platform upgrade roadmap. No breaking changes; this is a low-risk, incremental step that widens the product surface without adding a vendor.

For engineering: v1.6.0 is additive — framework/PHP version support widened (CI + composer constraints) plus new Terminal, Virtual Terminal, and Order API entry points. Treat it as a minor upgrade with two follow-ups: (1) verify endpoint coverage against the Paystack API reference and document any gaps that still require raw calls, and (2) confirm the package sits behind our own payment interface so a future provider swap or fork stays contained. Given the single-maintainer profile, keep it pinned, review the diff, and retain the option to fork.

Decision requested: approve the upgrade and a short spike to validate Terminal/Order API coverage against our near-term in-person and invoicing use cases.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
adachsoft/changelog-linter
adachsoft/collection
payerurl/telegrambot-crypto-payment-instant-payout
dskripchenko/laravel-hybrid-search
riorizkyrainey/lara-ced
mehedimi/static-vel
zharp/zharp
nonsapiens/bigquery-model-sync
lgu-bayambang-ict-office/lgu-laravel-development-standards
andydefer/laravel-support
se7enxweb/flysystem
lampwick/laravel
jeslage/statamic-emojis
micahdshackelford/rmap-laravel
draftsmaninc/draftsman
square-bit/laravel-volition
himito/laravel-mailman
htinlynn/genius-helper
maco-studios/hephaestus
adachsoft/php-code-style