- Can I use morozovsk/yii2-websocket in a Laravel application?
- Technically you can install it with Composer, but it is a Yii2 integration layer rather than a Laravel package. It expects Yii2 application components, configuration, console commands, and event conventions, so it will not plug into Laravel's container, Artisan, or auth model cleanly. For production, treat it as a separate Yii2 WebSocket service or choose a Laravel-native option.
- Is morozovsk/yii2-websocket compatible with Laravel 10 or 11?
- There is no Laravel 10 or 11 support in the package; it targets Yii2, and its last release was in 2016. Modern Laravel versions and PHP 8 runtimes are likely to expose dependency and compatibility friction. Do not assume it will install or run on a current Laravel stack without a technical spike.
- How do I install morozovsk/yii2-websocket with Composer?
- You would normally require it in a Yii2 project with composer require morozovsk/yii2-websocket and wire its Yii2 components and console command into that application. Installing it into a Laravel composer.json is possible, but the package still expects Yii2 bootstrapping and configuration. For Laravel, prefer a maintained WebSocket server or isolate this package in its own Yii2 service.
- What is morozovsk/yii2-websocket used for?
- It is a Yii2 extension for running a WebSocket server and managing connections and messages for real-time features such as chat, notifications, and dashboards. It provides Yii2-oriented integration rather than framework-agnostic WebSocket primitives. In a Laravel codebase, that makes it an architectural mismatch unless used as an isolated sidecar service.
- Does morozovsk/yii2-websocket support Laravel session authentication?
- No, it does not understand Laravel's encrypted cookies, session guards, or user provider model. A Yii2 WebSocket service would need a token-based or signed-payload handshake, plus explicit channel authorization and token expiry handling. Plan authentication and tenant isolation across the socket boundary before considering it.
- How does morozovsk/yii2-websocket compare to Laravel Reverb or Soketi?
- Laravel Reverb and Soketi are designed for Laravel's broadcasting and auth model, while morozovsk/yii2-websocket is a Yii2 integration from 2016. Reverb is first-party and Soketi is widely used with Laravel Echo, giving better maintenance and deployment guidance. For a Laravel application, this package introduces a second framework runtime and operational model with little upside.
- Is morozovsk/yii2-websocket maintained and production-ready?
- The last release was in 2016 and the project has modest community traction, so there is no evidence of active maintenance. That creates dependency-rotation risk, unclear security ownership, and likely PHP upgrade blockers. A team considering it should budget for forking and maintaining it rather than relying on community support.
- Can I run morozovsk/yii2-websocket as a separate service alongside Laravel?
- Yes, that is the more realistic integration approach: run it as an isolated Yii2 WebSocket service and let Laravel publish events through Redis pub/sub, a queue, or an internal API. The socket service handles connections and fan-out while Laravel remains the system of record. This is a service integration, not a Laravel package integration, and it still carries the abandoned-package risk.
- How do I test morozovsk/yii2-websocket in a Laravel project?
- There are no Laravel test helpers or package-specific testing utilities, so you would test the isolated service boundary instead. Use integration tests for the token handshake, channel authorization, message contracts, reconnect behavior, and Redis or queue fan-out. If you fork the package, add unit tests around its connection and message handlers before relying on it.
- What are alternatives to morozovsk/yii2-websocket for real-time features in Laravel?
- Prefer Laravel Reverb, Soketi, Ratchet, Swoole, or a managed service such as Pusher or Ably for Laravel real-time features. These options align with Laravel broadcasting, authentication, and deployment patterns. If polling or server-sent events meet the latency and volume requirements, they may be simpler than operating a stateful WebSocket tier.