- Does link0/profiler work with Laravel out of the box?
- No. The package is a generic PHP profiling library built around XHProf or uprofiler and does not appear to ship a first-class Laravel service provider, middleware, config integration, or framework-aware lifecycle hooks. You would need to wrap it with Laravel application code, register any bootstrap wiring yourself, and control it behind your own configuration or feature flags.
- How do I install link0/profiler in a Laravel application?
- Installation is not just a Composer require in a typical Laravel app. You must first confirm that XHProf or uprofiler is available and compatible with your PHP runtime, then add Composer dependencies, register any required bootstrap or service-provider code, publish or create configuration, and wire request instrumentation manually. Plan an isolated proof of concept before adding it to an existing Laravel codebase.
- Which PHP and Laravel versions are supported by link0/profiler?
- The available context does not document supported Laravel or PHP versions, and the package is not Laravel-native. You must inspect its Composer constraints and prove compatibility against your target PHP version, Laravel version, runtime image, and extension build. Treat version support as an open risk rather than assuming modern Laravel compatibility.
- Do I need XHProf or uprofiler to use link0/profiler?
- Yes. The library is described as using XHProf or uprofiler, so extension availability is the critical runtime dependency. Managed Laravel platforms, containerized deployments, and modern PHP versions may not include these legacy profiling extensions by default. Validate extension availability and compatibility in the exact runtime image before planning integration.
- How does link0/profiler persist profiling data?
- The package provides multiple pluggable persistence layers, but the details are not fully documented in the provided context. A Laravel integration would likely require database, file, or custom storage configuration plus retention and cleanup controls. Confirm which persistence backends are actually supported and how they are maintained before using them in shared or production environments.
- Can link0/profiler be used safely in production Laravel applications?
- It carries high technical risk for production-critical profiling because it depends on legacy extensions, lacks first-class Laravel integration, and shows weak maintenance signals. If used at all, it should be disabled by default, gated behind an environment flag, limited with sampling, secured against artifact exposure, and given strict retention controls. Measure overhead under representative load and document a rollback path before enabling it in production.
- Is link0/profiler a good alternative to Laravel Telescope or Laravel Debugbar?
- For most Laravel teams, no. Laravel Telescope and Laravel Debugbar are framework-native diagnostics with better Laravel lifecycle integration and lower integration risk. link0/profiler is a generic PHP profiler that may only make sense in legacy or constrained environments where XHProf or uprofiler is already available and accepted. Prefer native Laravel tooling unless you specifically need to reuse XHProf data or existing persistence.
- How can I enable link0/profiler only for specific Laravel requests?
- There is no documented Laravel-native middleware or per-request enablement mechanism in the provided context. You would need to build a custom wrapper, middleware, or request hook with a feature flag and configuration that defaults to disabled. The package may assume global profiler enablement or specific superglobals, so validate behavior carefully before exposing it to selective traffic.
- What are the maintenance and abandonment risks of link0/profiler?
- The context shows 14 GitHub stars, unknown repository metadata, a low package score, and likely limited maintenance activity. XHProf and uprofiler are legacy profiling technologies with narrow support on modern PHP runtimes, increasing the chance of incompatibility or abandoned dependencies. If you adopt it, assume you may need to own a fork and define a migration or exit path.
- How does link0/profiler compare with Blackfire, Tideways, or Xdebug?
- Blackfire and Tideways are commercial APM or profiling tools with stronger production controls, modern runtime support, and less Laravel integration work. Xdebug is typically used for local step debugging and development profiling rather than package-managed persistence. link0/profiler may be useful only when you must reuse XHProf or uprofiler data and are prepared to own the Laravel wrapper, persistence, security, and maintenance burden.