Weave Code
Api Problem Bundle Laravel Package
libero/api-problem-bundle
Libero API Problem Bundle adds RFC 7807 Problem Details support to Symfony APIs, helping you return consistent, machine-readable error responses. Map exceptions to standard problem types and keep JSON error payloads predictable across services.
Implements the Libero API error standard
Frequently asked questions about Api Problem Bundle
- Is libero/api-problem-bundle a Laravel package?
- No. Despite being evaluated alongside Laravel packages, libero/api-problem-bundle is a Symfony bundle that hooks into Symfony's kernel.exception event to convert exceptions and validation failures into RFC 7807 application/problem+json responses. It is a reasonable fit for Symfony-based APIs and a non-fit for Laravel unless wrapped in custom middleware. Laravel teams should evaluate a Laravel-native RFC 7807 implementation or hand-rolled middleware instead of forcing this bundle through adapters.
- How do I install and register libero/api-problem-bundle in a Symfony application?
- It is Composer-installable and follows standard Symfony bundle registration, with a low setup footprint based on an exception listener, problem-type mapping, and optional extensions. Because the repository is archived and the last release was v0.2.0 on 2019-02-20, pin the exact version rather than using a floating constraint. If you adopt it, vendor or fork the source into an internal repository and isolate usage behind a thin adapter so its listener and mapping API do not leak into controllers or domain code.
- Does libero/api-problem-bundle support Symfony 6, Symfony 7, and PHP 8?
- That is unlikely without patching. The bundle was last released in 2019 at v0.2.0, so its Symfony and PHP version constraints are almost certainly stale and may conflict with Symfony 6 or 7 and PHP 8.x. Treat compatibility as a time-boxed spike in a non-production branch, and if Composer constraints fail, evaluate maintained alternatives before committing to a fork.
- What does libero/api-problem-bundle actually do with exceptions and validation errors?
- It automatically converts thrown exceptions and validation failures into consistent RFC 7807 Problem Details documents served as application/problem+json. Titles, types, and detail fields are configurable, which helps replace ad-hoc JSON error payloads with a predictable structure across API endpoints. The main use case is standardizing machine-readable error responses in Symfony APIs so clients can consume and debug failures more easily.
- Is libero/api-problem-bundle maintained and safe to use in production?
- The repository is archived, last released in 2019, and sits at a pre-1.0 v0.2.0 with 0 stars and 0 dependents, so there is effectively no maintainer, community signal, or security patch path. Adopting it means owning a fork or accepting unpatched code, and supply-chain risk from unmaintained transitive dependencies is real. Before production use, run a security review and confirm whether your organization tolerates an archived dependency on the API error path.
- What data does the v0.2.0 logging change write to logs?
- The v0.2.0 Add logging change means exception context may be written to logs, which introduces a PII and secret-leakage surface that must be reviewed before production use. Confirm exactly what data is included and whether redaction is configurable. Exercise the logging output against your configured Monolog handlers, structured JSON channels, and external sinks in a production-like staging environment.
- What are maintained alternatives to libero/api-problem-bundle?
- Maintained options include nelmio/api-problem, API Platform's native problem-details support, and Symfony ErrorHandler custom renderers. These cover the same core need of returning consistent problem+json error responses without relying on an archived bundle. Evaluate them before forking libero/api-problem-bundle, and plan an exit path to one of them from day one if you adopt the bundle.
- Should I use RFC 7807 or RFC 9457 for API error responses?
- RFC 7807 was superseded by RFC 9457 in 2023, so any adoption should confirm the bundle still meets current client expectations. The payload shapes are broadly compatible, which reduces migration friction, but you should verify media type handling and field expectations with API consumers. If strict current-standards compliance matters, prefer a maintained implementation that explicitly supports RFC 9457.
- How should I test libero/api-problem-bundle error responses?
- Add contract tests for the application/problem+json media type and for the type, title, detail, and status fields returned for mapped exceptions and validation failures. Test that the exception listener does not conflict with existing error handlers, the framework ErrorHandler, or API Platform's own problem-details layer. Also verify logging behavior and redaction in a staging environment before rolling out behind a scope-limited flag.
- Can I use libero/api-problem-bundle with Laravel?
- It is not recommended. The bundle is built for Symfony's kernel.exception event and bundle registration model, and wrapping it in Laravel middleware adds complexity without solving the maintenance and compatibility risks. If the target application is Laravel, stop here and use a Laravel-native RFC 7807 implementation or custom middleware. Confirm whether the product is actually Laravel or Symfony first, because that resolves the recommendation entirely.
Weaver
How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?