Weave Code
Code Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Packager Laravel Package

laravel-ready/packager

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Accelerating package development: Reduces time-to-market for Laravel packages by automating boilerplate setup (e.g., PSR-compliant structure, Laravel API integration, and folder templates). Enables PMs to prioritize core functionality over scaffolding.
  • Standardization & consistency: Ensures all internal/external Laravel packages adhere to best practices (PSR standards, Laravel conventions), reducing technical debt and onboarding friction for engineers.
  • Build vs. buy: Justifies building in-house packages (vs. outsourcing or using generic tools) by lowering the barrier to entry for non-experts. Ideal for teams with frequent package needs (e.g., microservices, shared libraries).
  • Roadmap alignment: Supports initiatives like modularizing monoliths, adopting Laravel as a platform for internal tools, or open-sourcing components. Example: If the roadmap includes 3+ Laravel packages/year, this tool amortizes setup costs.
  • Developer experience (DX): Reduces context-switching for engineers by providing a CLI-driven workflow (vs. manual file creation or copy-pasting templates). Aligns with PM goals to improve team velocity and morale.

When to Consider This Package

  • Adopt when:

    • Your team frequently builds Laravel packages (e.g., >2/quarter) and manual setup is a bottleneck.
    • You lack a dedicated "package architect" to enforce consistency; automation mitigates risk of errors.
    • You’re standardizing on Laravel for internal tools or APIs, and need to scale package development.
    • Your roadmap includes open-sourcing Laravel components or contributing to the ecosystem.
    • Engineers report frustration with repetitive package scaffolding (qualitative feedback).
  • Look elsewhere if:

    • You only build 1–2 Laravel packages/year; the overhead of learning the tool may not justify savings.
    • Your packages require highly custom structures (e.g., non-PSR compliance, hybrid PHP/non-PHP stacks). This tool is opinionated.
    • Your team prefers visual tools (e.g., Laravel Shift, JetBrains IDE wizards) over CLI.
    • You’re using non-Laravel PHP frameworks (Symfony, Lumen) or need multi-framework support.
    • Security/compliance requires auditable manual setup (e.g., government/healthcare projects).

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For Executives:

"This tool cuts the time to create a new Laravel package from hours to minutes, accelerating our ability to modularize services, open-source components, or build internal tools faster. For example, if we’re launching 4 packages this year, this could save ~20 hours of engineering time—time we can reinvest in core features. It also ensures all packages follow Laravel best practices, reducing long-term maintenance costs. Think of it as ‘Composer for package creation’—just like Composer saved us from manual dependency management."

Ask: "Would you prioritize this for teams building Laravel-based products or tools?"


For Engineering Leaders:

*"Packager standardizes how we scaffold Laravel packages, so every new package starts with:

  • PSR-compliant structure (no more debates over file locations).
  • Laravel API integration (Service Providers, Facades, etc.) pre-configured.
  • Zero manual errors—templates handle boilerplate like composer.json, GitHub Actions, and docs.

This is especially valuable if:

  • You’re onboarding new engineers to package development.
  • You’re migrating legacy monoliths to microservices with Laravel.
  • You want to open-source a package without reinventing the wheel.

Trade-off: It’s CLI-only (no GUI), but the speed and consistency gains outweigh that for most teams. We can trial it on the next package and measure setup time."*

Ask: "Which of our upcoming Laravel projects would benefit most from this?"


For Developers:

*"Tired of manually creating Laravel packages? Packager does it for you in 5 steps:

  1. Run packager new
  2. Answer a few prompts (name, namespace, etc.)
  3. Boom—all files are generated (Service Providers, tests, docs, even GitHub Actions).

Why it’s better than copy-pasting templates:

  • Always up-to-date with Laravel’s latest conventions.
  • No forgotten files (e.g., CHANGELOG.md, phpunit.xml).
  • Works with GitHub/GitLab out of the box.

How to try it:

composer global require laravel-ready/packager --dev
packager new my-package

Let’s use it for [Project X] and compare the setup time to our current process."*

Ask: "What’s the biggest pain point you hit when creating a Laravel package?"

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
emuniq/filament-browser-notifications
syriable/filament-translator
hungnm28/livewire-form
wenprise/eloquent
crudly/encrypted
fadion/bouncy
cuci/prototurk-sdk
gos/pubsub-router-bundle
cuci/prototurk-sdk-symfony
clementtalleu/easyadmin-markdown-bundle
codeflextech/permission-manager
karnoweb/livewire-datepicker
sayedenam/sayed-dashboard
milito/query-filter
apiboxsym/user-bundle
apiboxsym/health-check-bundle
jayeshmepani/jpl-moshier-ephemeris-php
elnasnato/laraliveui
labrodev/rest-sdk
sampaui/sampaui