Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Workflow Laravel Package

juststeveking/workflow

A Laravel package for defining and running workflows in your applications. Model states, transitions, and actions so complex multi-step processes stay organized and predictable, with a clean, testable API for managing every stage of the flow.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

This package is aimed to be a simplistic PHP workflow package that works in a similar fashion to GitHub Actions.

Frequently asked questions about Workflow
How do I install juststeveking/workflow in a Laravel application?
Install it with Composer using the package name juststeveking/workflow, then follow the repository README for any Laravel service-provider or config publish steps. Because this is a 0.0.1 release, pin the exact version and review the source before adding it to an existing application. Confirm the supported Laravel and PHP constraints in composer.json before installation.
What Laravel and PHP versions does juststeveking/workflow support?
The provided context does not list a confirmed Laravel or PHP support matrix, so check the package composer.json and README before adoption. Add a CI matrix that exercises the package on your project’s supported Laravel and PHP versions. Treat version compatibility as a gating item for any pilot.
Is juststeveking/workflow a replacement for GitHub Actions or a BPM platform?
No, it is described as a simplistic PHP workflow package that works in a similar fashion to GitHub Actions, but it runs inside your Laravel application. It should be treated as an application-layer workflow runner for repeatable automation, not as a full BPM or orchestration platform. Avoid relying on it for critical orchestration until execution semantics, persistence, and observability are proven.
How are workflows defined in juststeveking/workflow?
The package is described as supporting file-defined workflows, but the exact workflow file syntax is not specified in the provided context. Review the README and source to confirm whether workflow files are declarative configuration or executable PHP code. Establish authoring standards and examples before letting multiple developers create workflows.
Can I use juststeveking/workflow for production-critical workflows?
The TPM assessment rates technical risk as high for the 0.0.1 release and recommends avoiding production-critical workflows until a controlled pilot validates behavior. Start with low-risk operational workflows such as scheduled maintenance tasks or internal notifications. Require monitoring, runbooks, rollback plans, and clear ownership before expanding usage.
Are workflow steps synchronous, queued, retryable, or idempotent?
The provided context does not confirm whether execution is synchronous or queue-backed, nor does it document retries or idempotency guarantees. Validate these behaviors in a sandbox proof of concept before trusting the package with important tasks. Check queue-worker behavior, concurrency limits, locking, and long-running workflow handling under load.
How do I trigger a workflow from a Laravel application?
The package likely provides Artisan commands or application entry points for creating and running workflow files, but the exact trigger mechanisms should be confirmed in the README. It may fit scheduled jobs or event-driven internal tasks, but verify this before designing around it. Wrap triggers behind a project-owned interface so the package can be replaced later.
How does juststeveking/workflow handle secrets, permissions, and audit logging?
The provided context does not document secret handling, permissions, or audit trails, and security of file-defined workflows is listed as a key concern. Do not store secrets directly in workflow files; use Laravel’s configuration and secret-management practices instead. Add logging and alerting around every pilot workflow, and confirm auditability requirements before production use.
Is juststeveking/workflow stable enough to adopt?
It is a 0.0.1 release, so expect API instability and breaking changes. Pin the exact version, assign an owner to track releases and changelogs, and keep internal wrappers and tests around the package. Start with a sandbox spike and one low-risk workflow rather than migrating critical automation directly.
How should I test juststeveking/workflow before rolling it out?
Begin with a source and documentation review plus a security check, then build a sandbox proof of concept. Pilot one low-risk workflow with monitoring and a rollback path, and validate failure handling, duplicate runs, partial execution, and observability. Only expand to additional workflows after demonstrating reliability and establishing clear ownership.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
elsayed85/laravel-api-exceptions
ouhssini/laravel-demo-mode
daworks/ncloud-outbound-mailer-driver
gp247/cms
ignibyte/aic-gates
nexa-merchant/blog
novasa/laravel-language-center
opencage/geocode
adolfoholzer/parameters
livenetworks/ln-starter
shitoudev/permissionmanager
johannesclimacus/laravel-tui
hocvt/seotools
vitalybaev/sypexgeo
amphibee/themosis-ignition
gito-me/fast-excel
frankyso/laravel-ipaymu
geolize-studio/laravel-chile
boomerangui/chat
cgv/localized-resource