- Is ivan1986/supervisor a Laravel package or a Symfony bundle?
- It is historically a Symfony bundle, not a native Laravel package. It is built around Symfony's DI container, configuration, and bundle lifecycle, so it does not map cleanly to Laravel's service-provider model. For Laravel, the useful part is likely the Supervisord control layer, not the bundle wiring itself.
- How do I install ivan1986/supervisor in a Laravel application?
- There is no native Composer install path for Laravel. You would need a compatibility bridge, custom configuration, and explicit lifecycle management, or extract the underlying Supervisord interaction into a Laravel service. Direct installation into a Laravel app is not recommended without a proof of concept.
- What Laravel and PHP versions does ivan1986/supervisor support?
- The provided context does not list supported Laravel, PHP, Symfony, or Supervisord versions. Expect friction around Symfony-era version constraints and config formats. Validate against your target Laravel version, PHP runtime, Supervisord version, and hosting model before committing.
- Can I use ivan1986/supervisor to generate Supervisor config for Laravel queues?
- It is aimed at defining and generating worker programs for queues and background jobs, so that concept fits Laravel queue workers. However, the package is Symfony-oriented, so generating Laravel-specific Supervisor config would require adaptation. Teams often manage Supervisor config statically through deployment tooling instead.
- Does ivan1986/supervisor control Supervisord via XML-RPC or config files?
- The context indicates the useful capability is likely the Supervisord control layer, with XML-RPC interaction as the probable mechanism, but does not confirm whether it uses XML-RPC, CLI, or config files directly. Confirm this by reading the source before integrating. Any runtime control surface needs authentication, authorization, audit logging, and network restrictions.
- Is ivan1986/supervisor safe to expose for runtime process control in production?
- High risk. Runtime control of Supervisord from an application introduces privilege, authentication, and blast-radius concerns, including privilege escalation and accidental termination of critical processes. Do not expose process-control endpoints without strong auth, authorization, auditing, and network restriction, and consider a feature flag in non-production first.
- What license does ivan1986/supervisor use and is it suitable for commercial Laravel projects?
- It uses the WTFPL license, which requires legal review for your organization. With minimal community signal and zero dependents, assume fork-and-own responsibility for any adopted code. Confirm organizational policy before using it in commercial Laravel projects.
- Is ivan1986/supervisor actively maintained and tested with Supervisord 4.x?
- The context shows very low adoption (8 stars, 0 dependents) and likely stale Symfony-era assumptions. It does not confirm active maintenance or tested compatibility with Supervisord 4.x. Treat it as self-supported and budget time for source review and tests around process-control behavior.
- What are alternatives to ivan1986/supervisor for managing Supervisor in Laravel?
- Laravel teams typically manage Supervisord through static config files and deployment tooling rather than runtime web controls. Alternatives include writing a small Laravel-native adapter around Supervisord XML-RPC, using orchestration APIs, or using deployment scripts to generate and reload Supervisor programs. Keep any adapter behind an interface so it can be replaced later.
- How should I test or spike ivan1986/supervisor before adopting it in Laravel?
- Spike it in a non-production Laravel app, identify the Supervisord API calls you actually need, and wrap only those operations in a Laravel service. Keep the adapter behind an interface, add explicit auth and audit logging, and test failure modes such as XML-RPC unavailability, restart races, and stale config. Deploy behind a feature flag before any restricted production use.