- How do I install ipop/plans in a Laravel application?
- Install it with Composer using composer require ipop/plans, then publish any provided config and migration files and run php artisan migrate. You will typically attach the package trait to your billable Eloquent model, such as User or Team, and seed your plan and feature records. Because the public README excerpt is not available here, confirm the exact publish tags and trait name in the repository before wiring it in.
- Which Laravel and PHP versions does ipop/plans support?
- Check the composer.json illuminate/* and php constraints in the repository, since version support cannot be confirmed from the public signals alone. There is no visible CI matrix or dependent ecosystem proving compatibility across Laravel majors. Test the package against your exact Laravel and PHP versions before committing, and plan for manual upgrades if constraints are narrow.
- Does ipop/plans conflict with Laravel Cashier's subscriptions table?
- A conflict is possible because ipop/plans appears to model subscriptions and plan state, which can overlap with Cashier's subscriptions table. Publish and review every migration before running it, and check whether table names and model bindings are configurable so you can prefix them. The safer architecture is to keep Cashier or Stripe as the source of truth for money and use this package only as an entitlement layer.
- How does ipop/plans handle feature gating and metered usage?
- The package is positioned around plan definitions, feature entitlements, and countable or limited feature usage, so it can act as the entitlement layer beside your billing provider. It is not confirmed from public signals whether boolean entitlements and metered quotas are modeled separately or how limits are enforced. Verify the feature model and gate API in the source before relying on it for paid feature access.
- Are ipop/plans usage counters safe under concurrent requests?
- This cannot be confirmed from the public signals, so inspect whether counters use atomic database operations, transactions, or read-modify-write logic. Entitlement consumption is revenue-critical, and a race condition can over-grant paid features or block paying customers. Write parallel-request tests around consume and remaining before trusting the package in production, and wrap counter mutations in your own service if needed.
- Can I use ipop/plans with multi-tenant apps and Team models?
- The package is designed for a Laravel monolith with an Eloquent subscriber model that can take a trait, such as User or Team. For multi-tenant use, verify that the subscriber relationship is polymorphic and supports your tenant model plus any per-tenant plan overrides. Test overrides and tenant switching explicitly, because entitlement leaks across tenants are a serious risk.
- Does ipop/plans handle plan changes, proration, trials, and grace periods?
- The package appears focused on plan definitions, entitlements, subscription state, and plan events rather than payment-provider billing mechanics. Proration, trials, grace periods, and dunning are usually owned by Cashier, Stripe, or Paddle, so confirm what the package actually stores before assuming it handles them. If you need those flows, keep them in the billing provider and treat this package as the entitlement projection.
- Is ipop/plans maintained and safe to use in production?
- Public signals show 1 star, 0 dependents, a single maintainer, and a 0.005 score, so treat it as unmaintained by default with a bus factor of 1. There is no visible security review, known production usage, or proven upgrade posture across Laravel majors. The mitigating factor is likely a small codebase you can audit, vendor, and own; adopt it only if you accept that ownership.
- What alternatives exist to ipop/plans for Laravel plan management?
- Laravel Cashier covers billing subscriptions but not a full entitlement catalog, while Laravel Pennant handles feature flags rather than plan quotas. Many teams hand-roll a small plans, features, and usage table set behind their own interface, or use a SaaS entitlement service for provider-agnostic gating. Compare ipop/plans against building a thin internal layer, especially if you need proration, trials, or multi-provider support.
- How should I test an ipop/plans integration?
- Wrap the package behind your own EntitlementResolver or SubscriptionService interface with methods like can, remaining, consume, and currentPlan, then test those methods rather than package internals. Cover plan lookup, subscription transitions, counter consumption under concurrency, and migration collisions with Cashier or existing tables. Also verify the package test suite and CI matrix in the repository, and pin the version in composer.json so upgrades are deliberate.