Weave Code
Wireui Laravel Package
foxws/wireui
Foxws WireUI is a Laravel and Livewire UI component library with ready-made Tailwind-styled Blade components such as buttons, modals, notifications, forms, and inputs. It helps you build interactive interfaces faster with less custom markup.
At a glance
Frequently asked questions about Wireui
- Is foxws/wireui a fork of wireui/wireui?
- Foxws/wireui shares its name, API surface, and component set with wireui/wireui, so treat it as a fork or derivative until the maintainer documents otherwise. Before adopting it, ask for the stated reason for the fork and the policy for tracking upstream releases. Also confirm whether the component API stays close enough that you could swap back to upstream with minimal changes.
- How do I install foxws/wireui in a Laravel app?
- Require the package with Composer, then publish its config and Blade views so you can override them locally. Register the package's Alpine plugin in your JavaScript entry point, add the package view paths to the content array in tailwind.config.js, and rebuild your assets with Vite. After that you can use the components directly inside your Livewire Blade views.
- Which Laravel, Livewire, Tailwind, and Alpine versions does foxws/wireui support?
- The supported matrix is not spelled out in the package overview, so check the composer.json constraints and CI configuration for the exact PHP, Laravel, Livewire, Tailwind, and Alpine versions before committing. The natural fit is a Laravel 10 to 12 application on Livewire 3 with Tailwind and Alpine already in place. Watch the Tailwind v3 to v4 boundary and Alpine major-version alignment, since mismatches are the most common cause of broken rendering.
- Do I need Livewire to use foxws/wireui?
- Yes. Foxws/wireui is a Blade component library for the TALL stack, and its modals, dialogs, notifications, dropdowns, and inputs rely on Livewire and Alpine.js for their interactive behaviour. It is a poor fit for Blade-only applications without Livewire, for Inertia, Vue, or React front ends, and for teams already standardized on Filament, Flux, or another component system.
- Why are my WireUI components rendering unstyled or non-interactive?
- Components that render but look unstyled usually mean Tailwind is not scanning the package's Blade views, so add the package view paths to the content globs in tailwind.config.js and rebuild your assets. Components that render but do not respond usually mean the Alpine plugin was not registered or that Alpine and Livewire major versions are misaligned. On Tailwind v4, confirm the package supports CSS-based configuration instead of assuming the JavaScript config approach still applies.
- Is foxws/wireui safe to use in production?
- The package has effectively zero stars, dependents, and ecosystem traction, which is a genuine supply-chain and bus-factor concern for a library that ships Blade views and JavaScript into the browser. If you adopt it, pin the exact version, vendor or mirror the source internally, and treat upgrades as reviewed changes rather than routine composer updates. Also verify the license and confirm the Blade views and compiled assets are redistributable under your compliance posture.
- How long does it take to add foxws/wireui to an existing Laravel application?
- In a greenfield Livewire application, expect roughly half a day to get your first component working end to end. In an existing application, plan one to three days once Tailwind content globs, Alpine bootstrapping, and design-token conflicts are reconciled. The installation itself is mechanical; the friction is aligning Tailwind and Alpine with what the package expects.
- How do I customize the styling and design tokens of foxws/wireui components?
- Publish the package views and configuration so you can override the markup locally rather than patching files in vendor. WireUI-style components typically assume the default Tailwind palette and spacing, so adapting them to a brand system means overriding those tokens or rewriting the component classes. Budget time for reconciling conflicts with your existing design system so you do not end up with two competing component vocabularies.
- Is foxws/wireui actively maintained?
- Ask who maintains the fork, what the release cadence has been over the last twelve months, and whether there is a funded succession plan. The overview shows no visible security-advisory or CVE channel, so clarify the response time for a reported vulnerability. With no third-party tutorials, Stack Overflow answers, or integration guides, your team absorbs the full support burden.
- Can I switch back to wireui/wireui or hand-rolled Blade components later?
- Because the component API closely mirrors upstream wireui/wireui, switching back should be a low-cost change provided you keep package usage confined to Blade views in the presentation layer. Avoid extending or monkey-patching internal classes so the swap stays mechanical. If the fork stalls entirely, hand-rolled Blade components or a design system your team already standardizes on are the fallback.
Weaver
How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?