Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Enumeration Laravel Package

eloquent/enumeration

Eloquent Enumeration brings typed enum support to Laravel’s Eloquent models. Define reusable enums, cast attributes to enum instances, and keep status or type fields type-safe and expressive without leaving familiar Eloquent conventions.

Deep Wiki
Context7

Technical Evaluation

  • Architecture fit: eloquent/enumeration is a pre-PHP 8.1 enum abstraction for PHP. It can fit only legacy PHP/Laravel estates that cannot use native enums. It is not a strategic fit for modern Laravel applications, where native backed enums, Eloquent casts, validation rules, and serialization support are first-class. The package is PHP-level rather than Laravel-specific, so any Eloquent cast, validation, or API serialization behavior likely requires custom glue.
  • Integration feasibility: Feasible as a small Composer dependency in a legacy codebase because the API surface is likely simple and the license is MIT. However, the repository is unknown, the package is archived, and the last release was 2018-11-22. Those facts create provenance and lifecycle risk that outweigh the package’s high aggregate score.
  • Technical risk: High. Archived status means no upstream fixes, no PHP compatibility work, and no security response. PHP 8.1+ native enums supersede the pattern. Risks include PHP upgrade incompatibility, static-analysis/autoload issues, serialization drift, and unclear behavior under newer Laravel versions. The unknown repository prevents normal source review, CVE monitoring, and maintainer due diligence.
  • Key questions:
    • Which PHP and Laravel versions must be supported?
    • Can the application adopt native PHP 8.1+ enums now, or is this strictly a legacy bridge?
    • Is the package used only for constants, or also for persistence, validation, API contracts, and queue serialization?
    • Are enum values stored in databases or exchanged through APIs where backward compatibility matters?
    • Who owns the dependency, and are we prepared to fork/vendor it under MIT if needed?
    • What is the provenance of the unknown repository, and can the source be audited?

Integration Approach

  • Stack fit: Suitable only for legacy PHP 7.x-era applications or transitional Laravel versions that lack native enum support. Not recommended for greenfield Laravel work. In modern stacks, use native backed enums plus Eloquent casts and Laravel validation instead.
  • Migration path: Treat the package as temporary technical debt. Inventory all usages, wrap access behind an application-owned enum interface or adapter, add characterization tests for values and serialization, then migrate incrementally to native enums. Avoid spreading the package’s base class or constants directly across domain code.
  • Compatibility: Validate the Composer constraint matrix against the target PHP, Laravel, PHPUnit, static-analysis, and database layers. Test serialization formats, database casts, validation messages, and API payloads. Confirm behavior on the oldest and newest supported runtimes before adoption.
  • Sequencing:
    1. Freeze new usages and require architecture approval for additions.
    2. Inventory enum classes, stored values, API exposures, and validation rules.
    3. Add an internal adapter or facade to isolate the dependency.
    4. Pilot migration of one low-risk enum to native PHP enums.
    5. Convert domain and persistence layers with backward-compatible value mapping.
    6. Remove eloquent/enumeration once no runtime or test references remain.
    7. If migration is blocked, fork/vendor the package with an explicit owner and patch policy.

Operational Impact

  • Maintenance: No upstream maintenance. The package is archived and last released in 2018. Any bug, PHP compatibility issue, or security concern must be handled internally. Low code volume may make forking feasible, but it still creates permanent ownership burden.
  • Support: Community-only historical support. No vendor, no active maintainer, no predictable CVE process, and an unknown repository weakens supply-chain confidence. A TPM should require an internal owner and an exit plan before allowing use.
  • Scaling: Runtime overhead is likely negligible; the scaling concern is organizational. Every additional usage increases migration surface and long-term upgrade friction. The package does not materially help application scalability.
  • Failure modes: PHP upgrades may break class loading or behavior; enum values may drift between code, database, validation, and APIs; serialized values may become incompatible; static analysis and IDE support may degrade; archived code may accumulate unpatched issues; unknown provenance may fail security review.
  • Ramp-up: Initial developer ramp-up is low because the enum concept is simple. Migration ramp-up is moderate because teams must map legacy constants/value objects to native enums, preserve persisted values, and update validation and serialization. Modern developers may need explicit guidance to avoid adopting the legacy pattern in new code.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
payerurl/telegrambot-crypto-payment-instant-payout
dskripchenko/laravel-hybrid-search
riorizkyrainey/lara-ced
mehedimi/static-vel
zharp/zharp
nonsapiens/bigquery-model-sync
lgu-bayambang-ict-office/lgu-laravel-development-standards
andydefer/laravel-support
se7enxweb/flysystem
lampwick/laravel
jeslage/statamic-emojis
micahdshackelford/rmap-laravel
draftsmaninc/draftsman
square-bit/laravel-volition
himito/laravel-mailman
htinlynn/genius-helper
maco-studios/hephaestus
elmogy/larafast
xeviant/laravel-paystack
gorilladash/laravel-website-sdk