Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Laravel Request Tracker Laravel Package

dragon-code/laravel-request-tracker

Laravel Request Tracker logs every incoming HTTP request to your database — method, URL, status, duration, IP and user agent — via a drop-in middleware. Includes Artisan commands, configurable retention, and a dashboard for reviewing and pruning request history.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Build vs. buy for distributed tracing. This package offers a low-cost, Laravel-native way to instrument inter-service HTTP calls without committing to a commercial APM contract (Datadog, New Relic, Honeycomb). It is a credible "buy the cheap option first" input when the team is deciding whether observability warrants a paid platform.
  • Observability roadmap sequencing. Helps answer "do we invest in tracing now or after we scale?" A drop-in request tracker lets you validate that tracing data actually changes incident response before funding a larger observability initiative.
  • Incident response and MTTR feature work. Supports prioritizing correlation IDs, request logging, and cross-service debugging as backlog items by making the cost of "we can't see what service called what" visible during postmortems.
  • Microservices migration gating. Informs the decision to split a Laravel monolith into services — you can measure and trace the new service boundaries as they appear, rather than discovering blind spots in production.
  • SLA/SLO readiness. Provides the raw inter-service call data needed to define realistic latency and error-rate SLOs before committing them to customers or internal stakeholders.
  • Vendor risk and maintenance policy. The package's low adoption (6 stars, 0 dependents) is a data point for your dependency governance and open-source risk policy, informing how much internal ownership you must budget for.

When to Consider This Package

Consider it when:

  • You run a Laravel-centric stack where services already communicate over HTTP and you want instrumentation that matches your framework idiom rather than a language-agnostic agent.
  • You need lightweight, low-ops tracing — a small team without a dedicated observability engineer, where standing up Jaeger/OpenTelemetry collectors is disproportionate.
  • You are in an early or pilot phase of service decomposition and want quick visibility to validate hypotheses before investing in a full APM.
  • Your budget is constrained and "good enough" correlation logging beats no tracing at all.
  • You are comfortable vendoring or owning the code — MIT license means forking is cheap if upstream stalls.

Look elsewhere when:

  • You already have a mature APM/OpenTelemetry pipeline — duplicate instrumentation adds noise and maintenance.
  • You need enterprise-grade compliance (retention controls, PII scrubbing guarantees, SOC 2 vendor posture); a 6-star package with no dependents cannot carry that burden.
  • You require high-throughput, production-critical tracing where maturity, support SLAs, and battle-testing matter more than developer ergonomics.
  • You are not on Laravel, or you have standardized on a vendor-neutral tracing standard and want to avoid framework-specific lock-in.
  • Long-term maintenance risk is unacceptable — with 0 dependents and single-maintainer signals, you must assume responsibility for security patches and PHP version upgrades.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

To executives: This is a small, free, MIT-licensed Laravel package that gives us visibility into how our services talk to each other. It's a low-cost experiment — days of engineering effort, no license fees — that lets us prove whether tracing improves incident response before we commit to a six-figure observability platform. The trade-off is maturity: it's a young, low-adoption library, so we should pilot it in a non-critical environment and be prepared to own the code if upstream slows. I recommend a bounded pilot with a decision checkpoint, not a production dependency today.

To engineering: Adopting this package buys us framework-native, end-to-end request telemetry with minimal ceremony — suitable for stubbing out correlation IDs and call graphs during a service migration. The primary risks are maintenance (single maintainer, negligible adoption) and integration overlap if we later introduce OpenTelemetry. Recommend: pilot behind a feature flag, fork if necessary, and design the instrumentation boundary so we can swap it for a standards-based tracer without rewriting call sites. Treat it as a scouting purchase, not a foundation.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
skyraptor/chatter
edlugz/sasapay
abbasudo/artisan-route
mirvan/ippanel
ignibyte/aic-framework
glavweb/data-schema-bundle
glavweb/datagrid-bundle
tacticmedia/scim-server
uni-method/frame
neika-ai/sdk
adachsoft/php-code-style
pharaonic/laravel-notification-dependencies
beautinow/translug
dev-brainiac/bot-cloaked
octoberrain/html
octoberrain/extension
octoberrain/exception
octoberrain/contracts
adachsoft/api-version-bundle
cgv/localized-resource