Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Laravel Zip Bomb Guard Laravel Package

dineshuprety/laravel-zip-bomb-guard

A Laravel package that helps guard against zip bombs by validating ZIP archives before extraction, enforcing configurable size and file-count limits, and supporting safer handling of uploaded archives in your application.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Technical Evaluation

  • Architecture fit: Laravel-native package with service provider auto-discovery, facade alias, validation rule (NoZipBomb), extraction concern (SafeExtractsZips), config publishing, and Artisan command. It fits Laravel applications that accept user-supplied ZIP archives and need defensive checks against zip bombs. The move to the shared ZipBombGuard\ namespace improves project identity and reduces maintainer-coupling, but it is a hard breaking change.
  • Integration feasibility: The Composer package name remains dineshuprety/laravel-zip-bomb-guard, so dependency installation remains straightforward with ^2.0. The main integration work is namespace migration, not behavioral change. The release includes an upgrade guide, updated discovery metadata, examples, tests, and a Laravel 13 consumer upgrade validation, which reduces uncertainty.
  • Technical risk: High for applications with persisted queue jobs, failed_jobs records, serialized payloads, container bindings, mocks, or explicit provider/facade registrations that contain DineshUprety\ZipBombGuard\. Because the package does not alias old names, unresolved old class names will fail immediately at runtime. Risk is medium for test suites and internal documentation, and low for archive-safety behavior because config, facade alias, Artisan command, PHP/Laravel support, and scanning behavior are unchanged.
  • Key questions: Do we have queued jobs, failed jobs, cache/session payloads, or event listeners that serialize the old namespace? Do we have custom container bindings, mocks, or explicit provider/facade registration using the old namespace? Which Laravel/PHP versions are in production, and has discovery/config caching been refreshed? Can we drain or pause queues during deployment? Do any downstream internal packages depend on the 1.x namespace? What is the rollback plan if old serialized jobs surface after deploy? Is there a security or compliance driver to adopt v2.0.0 now rather than defer?
  • TPM recommendation: Treat v2.0.0 as a major dependency upgrade requiring a namespace audit and deployment coordination. Approve adoption after confirming no old-namespace serialized jobs remain, or after a queue-drain/pause plan is in place.

Integration Approach

  • Stack fit: No new runtime components are introduced. The package remains a Laravel library with the same PHP/Laravel support envelope and the same facade alias, configuration, command, and archive-safety behavior. Laravel 13 consumer validation covers discovery, facades, exception handling, validation, scanning, extraction, and config publishing.
  • Migration path: Inventory all occurrences of DineshUprety\ZipBombGuard\ across application code, tests, container bindings, mocks, provider/facade registration, and documentation. Follow the 1.x-to-2.x upgrade guide, then require ^2.0. Replace imports and fully qualified class names with ZipBombGuard\. Audit persisted jobs and failed jobs before deployment. Clear Laravel config/package discovery caches after deployment. Verify facade resolution, validation rule behavior, scanning, extraction, exception handling, and config publishing.
  • Compatibility: The breaking change is limited to the namespace. Package name, global facade alias, configuration, Artisan command, PHP/Laravel support, and archive safety behavior are unchanged. Existing 1.x releases remain available, which supports rollback. The package does not provide old-name aliases, so dual-namespace operation is not available by default; any temporary compatibility shim would be application-owned and should be treated as technical debt.
  • Sequencing: Run the namespace audit first. If no persisted old-namespace jobs exist, deploy code changes atomically with the Composer upgrade. If persisted jobs exist, pause producers or drain queues before deploying updated workers, then resume and monitor. In multi-service environments, deploy all producers and consumers that reference the old namespace in a coordinated window. Update CI and local development before production rollout. Rollback to 1.x requires reverting both Composer constraints and namespace changes, and should be tested before deployment.

Operational Impact

  • Maintenance: Ongoing maintenance is low because runtime behavior is unchanged. The release signals active maintenance through updated tests, fixtures, examples, contributor guidance, CI matrix coverage, and a documented upgrade path. TPM should track major-version upgrades and keep the namespace migration in the dependency governance record.
  • Support: Support burden is concentrated in the migration window. Developers need a clear runbook covering search-and-replace, queue inspection, cache clearing, and post-deploy verification. Because old names are not aliased, internal support documentation must explicitly call out the hard break and the 1.x rollback path.
  • Scaling: Scaling characteristics are unchanged from 1.x. Archive scanning and extraction resource usage still depend on archive size and configured limits, not on this namespace change. Queue workers and horizontally scaled consumers must run the updated code image before processing jobs that may reference the new namespace.
  • Failure modes: The primary failure mode is class not found during unserialization of queued jobs or retries of failed jobs containing old class names. Secondary failure modes include unresolved container bindings, broken test mocks, stale package discovery/config caches, missed explicit provider/facade registration, and rollback mismatch between application code and Composer version. These are deployment and migration failures, not archive-safety behavior regressions.
  • Ramp-up: Ramp-up is low for Laravel developers because the package surface is unchanged. The real effort is the migration checklist: namespace audit, queue state review, coordinated deployment, cache clearing, and verification. For a small application with no persisted old-namespace jobs, effort is likely hours to a day; for applications with active queues or many integrations, plan a short migration window with monitoring.
Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
andydefer/laravel-notification
adachsoft/cli-process-tester
jhaskell13/laraflow
sebastienheyd/boilerplate-media-manager
ccast/tagixo-primix
pretendtrue/laravel-builder
sawmainek/laravel-scout-tntsearch-driver
tomshaw/laravel-calendar-table
dibakar/laravel-ownership
steadrun/laravel-monitor
labyrinthe/connect-laravel
elmogy/layan
drewdan/sentinel-client
dskripchenko/laravel-llm
fatryst/nuonuo
stevenay/myanfont
gmostafa/php-graphql-client
xeviant/paystack
snowsoft/faker
meditationsteps/blogetc