Weave Code
Weaver
Helps Laravel developers discover, compare, and choose open-source packages. See popularity, security, maintainers, and scores at a glance to make better decisions.
Feedback
Share your thoughts, report bugs, or suggest improvements.
Subject
Message

Paghiper For Laravel Laravel Package

devajmeireles/paghiper-for-laravel

Seamless Laravel integration for PagHiper, the Brazilian payment gateway, letting you quickly generate boleto and PIX charges, manage transactions, and handle payment notifications directly within your PHP applications through a clean, fluent API.

View on GitHub
Deep Wiki
Context7

Product Decisions This Supports

  • Payment-method coverage for Brazil: PagHiper is a low-cost Brazilian gateway built around boleto bancário (bank slip) and PIX (instant transfer). This package is the shortest path to supporting both in a Laravel app, which is table stakes for any product charging Brazilian customers.
  • Build vs. buy (integration layer): The PagHiper API surface is small — create charge, query status, handle webhook, cancel/refund. The realistic build estimate for a first-party client is 1–3 engineer-days including webhook verification, error mapping, and tests. This package front-loads that work at the cost of a maintenance dependency, which is the actual decision on the table.
  • Market-validation sequencing: If Brazil is a hypothesis rather than a committed market, this lets you ship a paid pilot without committing to a heavier gateway contract or a multi-provider abstraction layer.
  • Checkout / conversion tradeoffs: Boleto settles in 1–2 business days and is used heavily by unbanked and credit-averse buyers; PIX settles near-instantly and now dominates Brazilian digital payments. Supporting both changes cart conversion, dunning design, and order-fulfilment timing — product decisions the PM owns, not just engineering.
  • Pricing and margin: PagHiper's fee structure (particularly on boleto) is meaningfully cheaper than card acquiring in Brazil. This directly informs whether you can profitably serve low-ticket SKUs.
  • Risk decision — ownership model: With 21 stars, 0 dependents, and a single maintainer, the real product decision is not "adopt or not" but "adopt as a reference implementation we vendor and own." Plan the fork on day one; do not treat it as infrastructure you can lean on.

When to Consider This Package

Adopt (with eyes open) when:

  • You are on a current Laravel version and shipping to Brazilian customers who need boleto and/or PIX.
  • You want PagHiper specifically — usually because of its low boleto fees, simple merchant onboarding, or an existing merchant account.
  • You value Laravel-native ergonomics (publishable config, facade/service-container binding, Eloquent-friendly models) over raw SDK usage.
  • You are comfortable vendoring the package and assigning an owner; treat the upstream repo as a head start, not a supplier.

Look elsewhere when:

  • You need credit card, subscriptions, tokenization, or multi-gateway failover. Use a mature abstraction (Omnipay, or a well-maintained gateway package) or go direct to Stripe/Pagar.me/Asaas — PagHiper is not the right primary for recurring card billing.
  • You are outside Brazil. The package, the gateway, and the payment methods are all Brazil-specific.
  • You need vendor support, SLAs, or an active community. Zero dependents and low stars mean no ecosystem signal, no Stack Overflow corpus, and no guarantee of a fix when PagHiper changes its API.
  • Your compliance posture is strict (audited PCI scope, SOC 2 evidence chain). A single-maintainer MIT package becomes a line item in your third-party risk register; you may prefer a first-party client you control.
  • The integration is trivial for you. If you already have an HTTP client layer and webhook infrastructure, the incremental value of the wrapper is low and the dependency cost is real.

Practical guardrails if you adopt: pin the version, write contract tests against the PagHiper sandbox, keep webhook handling idempotent in your code, and abstract the gateway behind your own internal interface so swapping providers is a one-file change.

How to Pitch It (Stakeholders)

For executives: PagHiper is a low-fee Brazilian gateway covering boleto and PIX, the two payment methods a large share of Brazilian buyers expect. This MIT-licensed Laravel package gets us to a working integration in days rather than weeks, with no licensing cost and no vendor lock-in. The tradeoff is maturity: it has a small user base and a single maintainer, so we should budget a small, bounded ongoing maintenance commitment and own our copy of the code. Recommended as a low-cost, reversible pilot enabler for Brazil — not as long-term critical infrastructure.

For engineering: It's a thin, conventional Laravel wrapper over PagHiper's REST API — config publishing, container binding, and model-friendly charge objects. It is a starting point, not a dependency to lean on. Plan to fork/vendor it, put our own interface in front of it, and own the webhook verification and idempotency ourselves. Estimate: roughly a one-day spike to validate against the sandbox, plus a day to harden error handling and tests. If we outgrow boleto/PIX-only, we swap the adapter — not the product.

Weaver

How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?

Conversation history is not saved when not logged in.
Prompt
Add packages to context
No packages found.
skyraptor/chatter
edlugz/sasapay
abbasudo/artisan-route
mirvan/ippanel
ignibyte/aic-framework
glavweb/data-schema-bundle
glavweb/datagrid-bundle
tacticmedia/scim-server
uni-method/frame
neika-ai/sdk
adachsoft/php-code-style
pharaonic/laravel-notification-dependencies
beautinow/translug
dev-brainiac/bot-cloaked
octoberrain/html
octoberrain/extension
octoberrain/exception
octoberrain/contracts
adachsoft/api-version-bundle
cgv/localized-resource