Weave Code
Modernizr Laravel Package
components/modernizr
Modernizr integration for Laravel that adds browser feature detection to your frontend workflow, helping you conditionally load assets and build progressive, cross-browser interfaces with less guesswork.
Shim repository for Modernizr.
Frequently asked questions about Modernizr
- What does components/modernizr actually provide for Laravel?
- The package is described as a thin Laravel/Blade wrapper around the Modernizr frontend asset. It is intended to add browser feature detection to Blade-rendered frontends so you can conditionally load assets and build progressive interfaces. The evaluation notes that the exact Blade helpers and published assets should be confirmed by inspecting the package, because its value is limited beyond asset publishing and Blade usage.
- Which Laravel and PHP versions does components/modernizr support?
- The exact Laravel and PHP constraints are not provided in the available context. Because the last release was in 2017, you should treat version compatibility as unverified and run a mandatory compatibility spike on your target stack. Pin and validate Composer constraints before committing to the package.
- How do I install components/modernizr in a Laravel application?
- A typical Laravel package installation would use Composer, followed by publishing any provided assets or configuration and referencing the Modernizr asset in a Blade layout. The available context does not list the exact service provider, publish tags, or Blade directives, so inspect the package after installation. Spike it on a branch or low-risk page before using it in production layouts.
- Does components/modernizr work with Vite or Laravel Mix asset pipelines?
- The evaluation says the package best fits legacy Laravel applications using Blade and a traditional asset pipeline. For modern Vite-based Laravel applications, importing Modernizr directly through npm is simpler and more transparent. If you test the package alongside Vite or Mix, verify published asset paths and avoid collisions with build-managed or CDN-managed assets.
- How are custom Modernizr builds configured, versioned, and updated with this package?
- The evaluation identifies custom Modernizr build configuration as the main integration work, but it does not confirm how the package generates or versions those builds. You should inspect the published assets and configuration to determine whether builds are manual or automated. Document the regeneration process and review it whenever browser support targets change.
- Is the NOASSERTION license safe for production use?
- NOASSERTION means the license could not be automatically recognized as a standard license, so it should be treated as unresolved until reviewed. The evaluation explicitly flags compliance risk and recommends resolving licensing before production use. Get legal or compliance approval before distributing or relying on the package.
- Is components/modernizr abandoned or actively maintained?
- The available context indicates a 2017 last release, low adoption of around 10 stars, and unknown repository provenance. That creates high abandonment risk, so you should expect to vendor, fork, or replace it rather than rely on upstream fixes. Assign an internal owner and document an exit plan if you adopt it.
- Can I replace components/modernizr with native CSS @supports, npm Modernizr, or a vendored asset?
- In many cases, yes. The evaluation notes that native CSS @supports, progressive enhancement, and modern build tooling reduce the need for Modernizr, while a direct npm/Vite import or a vendored Modernizr build with a Blade partial can achieve a similar outcome with less dependency risk. Compare those approaches during your spike before adopting the package.
- Does components/modernizr support CSP, SRI, CDN hosting, and async or deferred scripts?
- The available context does not confirm support for CSP-friendly loading, Subresource Integrity, CDN hosting, or async and deferred scripts. The evaluation specifically flags CSP blocking of inline detection scripts as a failure mode to test. Validate your CSP policy and asset delivery approach before production use.
- Is components/modernizr suitable for API-only, Inertia, React, or Vue-heavy Laravel applications?
- No, the evaluation says the package is not relevant to API-only services or Inertia and JavaScript-heavy frontend stacks. Its best fit is a legacy Laravel application using Blade templates and a traditional asset pipeline that needs feature detection for older browsers. Modern Vite-based applications should generally use direct npm integration instead.
Weaver
How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?