- How do I install astrogoat/go-load-up in a Laravel app?
- Install it with composer require astrogoat/go-load-up. Before running it, read composer.json for the declared PHP and Laravel constraints, and check the service provider's register and boot methods to see what it publishes or registers. The 2.10.0 release has no human-authored install notes, so verify setup against the source rather than a changelog.
- Which Laravel and PHP versions does go-load-up support?
- The declared support lives in composer.json require and require-dev, and the tested matrix lives in the repository's CI workflow files. The 2.10.0 release notes do not state Laravel or PHP versions, so confirm both before adopting. Check that the constraints match your app's current Laravel and PHP versions, since a mismatch is the most common integration failure for Laravel packages.
- Can go-load-up help prevent N+1 queries in Laravel?
- The package is described as a fluent API for loading Eloquent models with their relationships and related data, which is the same job Laravel's native with() and load() perform. Used correctly it should cut N+1 queries and reduce boilerplate in queries and controllers. The internals are unverified, so confirm by logging queries during a spike and comparing query counts with and without the package.
- Is go-load-up safe to use in production?
- Treat the 2.10.0 baseline as unverified: its release notes contain only an auto-generated compare link, with no features, fixes, or migration notes documented. A single-org package with sparse release notes is a sustainability signal rather than a defect, but it belongs in your adoption record. Read the 2.9.0 to 2.10.0 diff and run a spike before shipping it to production.
- Does go-load-up register middleware, publish migrations, or touch the asset pipeline?
- That is unknown until you read the source, because the release notes do not describe it. Read the service provider's register and boot methods and look specifically for global middleware registration, publishable migrations, container bindings, and asset pipeline changes. Service provider and config bindings are a low blast radius; middleware or asset pipeline patches are not. Judge fit on what the code does, not on the package name.
- How should I evaluate or spike go-load-up before adopting it?
- Budget roughly half a day: create a throwaway Laravel app, composer require the package, publish any config, and exercise one realistic load path. Use the query log, Laravel Debugbar, or Telescope to confirm the number and shape of queries it produces. Record the framework version support, PHP constraint, config surface, and whether a test suite exists.
- What changed between go-load-up 2.9.0 and 2.10.0?
- The 2.10.0 release notes contain only an auto-generated 2.9.0...2.10.0 compare link, with no PR list, migration notes, or deprecation notes. A minor bump should be additive and non-breaking by semver convention, but that is a prior rather than a guarantee, since Laravel packages often change default config values in minor releases. Read the diff itself for features, fixes, config default changes, or silent behaviour changes.
- Does go-load-up have a test suite and how actively is it maintained?
- Neither is documented in the release notes. Check the repository for a tests directory, CI workflow files, release cadence over the last 12 months, and issue-response history for the maintainer of record. Without those signals you cannot plan a patch window or judge how quickly a breakage would be fixed.
- What are alternatives to go-load-up for eager loading Eloquent relationships?
- Laravel's native eager loading is the baseline: with(), load(), and loadMissing() cover most relationship-loading needs without an extra dependency. For API filtering and includes, spatie/laravel-query-builder is a widely used option. Compare against the native methods first, since go-load-up's value depends on how much boilerplate it actually removes in your codebase.
- Does go-load-up add significant dependencies or supply-chain risk?
- The transitive dependency footprint has not been assessed; run composer show --tree or inspect the lock file after requiring it. There is also no data on CI, signed tags, or the maintainer's release process. Both belong in a supply-chain review before adoption, especially for a package at 2.10.0 with no human-authored changelog.