Migrate FormRequest `messages(): array` to inline `message:` on fluent chains. Dry-run, then apply. Activates when: user mentions migrate messages, messages array, inline message, remove messages().
php artisan boost:add-skill sandermuller/laravel-fluent-validation
Save this content to: .claude/skills/fluent-validation-migrate-messages/SKILL.md
# Migrate `messages(): array` → inline `message:`
Rewrite FormRequest `messages(): array` overrides into colocated `message:` named args on the rule chain in `rules()`. Remove the now-empty `messages()` method when all keys port. Keep only unportable entries behind a comment-stub.
## When to Activate
- User asks to migrate `messages(): array`, "kill messages arrays", "inline messages"
- User mentions: migrate messages, messages array, inline message, remove messages(), pull messages into rules
- After Phase 3 of laravel-fluent-validation 1.19+ inline-message rollout lands in their app
## Step 1: Verify installation
```
rg "sandermuller/laravel-fluent-validation" composer.json
```
Required: `sandermuller/laravel-fluent-validation ^1.19` or newer (inline `message:` param). If older, tell the user to upgrade first — earlier versions lack the `message:` named arg.
## Step 2: Find migration targets
```
rg "function messages\(\)" --type php -l
```
For each match, also verify it overrides `rules(): array` on the same class (FormRequests). Skip test files and non-FormRequest classes.
## Step 3: Classify each `messages(): array` entry
For every `'field.rule' => 'msg'` key, determine the migration path. Read the corresponding entry in `rules()` (same class) and walk the fluent chain.
### Portable cases
| Shape | Rewrite |
|---|---|
| Key `'field.rule'` matches a chain method like `->rule(…)` | Inline: `->rule(…, message: 'msg')` |
| Key `'field.ruleName'` matches the factory's implicit constraint (e.g. `'field.email'` on `FluentRule::email()`) | Factory-level: `FluentRule::email(message: 'msg')` |
| Key matches `->rule(someRule, …)` class-basename fallback | Stays as `->messageFor('someRule', 'msg')`; inline unavailable |
### Unportable cases — keep the `messages()` entry, flag with a comment
Each has a specific reason. Include the reason in the migration report so the user understands why.
1. **Multi-rule-per-factory**: one `FluentRule::email()` chain with three `messages()` keys `'email.required'`, `'email.string'`, `'email.email'`. The factory emits multiple validator rules internally; `message:` carries one binding. The `email` key can port via `FluentRule::email(message: '…')`; `required` ports if the chain has `->required()`; `string` has no method to attach to (it's a byproduct of `FluentRule::email()` setting `$constraints = ['string']`). **Keep `string` in `messages()` array.**
2. **Variadic-trailing methods**: `'field.required_with'` + chain has `->requiredWith('email', 'phone')`. PHP forbids params after variadic. **Rewrite to `->requiredWith('email', 'phone')->message('msg')` (shorter; `->message()` binds to `$lastConstraint` which `addRule` set to `'required_with'`). Not technically inline `message:`, but removes the `messages()` entry.**
3. **Composite method, non-last sub-rule**: `'field.integer'` + chain has `->digits(5)`. `->digits()` adds `integer` then `digits:N`; `message:` binds to the last. **Rewrite as `->digits(5)->messageFor('integer', 'msg')`.**
4. **DateRule build-time key**: `'field.date_format'` + chain is `FluentRule::date()->format('Y-m-d')`. DateRule's key varies between `'date'` and `'date_format:...'` at build. **Rewrite to `FluentRule::date()->format('Y-m-d')->messageFor('date_format', 'msg')`.**
5. **Dynamic key**: `"{$field}.required" => 'msg'`, `match` expression, interpolated variable. Static analysis can't resolve. **Leave entirely.**
6. **Wildcard key on nested `each()`/`children()`**: `'items.*.name.required'`. Walk the outer chain's `->each(...)` closure / array to find the matching inner FluentRule. Rewrite there. Flag complex cases (deeply-nested / multi-level wildcards) for manual review.
7. **Chain interrupted by `->when(…, fn ($r) => $r->required())`**: target rule lives inside the closure. **Rewrite inside the closure: `->when($cond, fn ($r) => $r->required(message: 'msg'))`.**
8. **`->rule('x:args')` escape-hatch string**: `'field.x' => 'msg'` + `->rule('x:args')`. No named method. **Rewrite to `->rule('x:args', message: 'msg')` (rule() accepts message: since Phase 3a).**
9. **Translated-value wrapper**: `'field.required' => __('messages.required')`. Value is still an expr, inline works: `->required(message: __('messages.required'))`. Port normally.
10. **Helper-method extraction**: `'field.required' => 'msg'` where the corresponding rule in `rules()` is `'email' => $this->emailRules()`. Cross-method resolution needed. **Flag for manual review, tip: "inline the chain or move message into helper return."**
11. **Macroable method in chain**: chain includes a method defined via `Macroable::macro(...)` at runtime. Not statically resolvable. **Leave with `messageFor` / `message`.**
12. **Custom `ValidationRule` object via `->rule(new MyRule())`**: message key derived from class-basename at runtime (`'myRule'` from `MyRule`). **Rewrite to `->rule(new MyRule(), message: 'msg')` — `rule()` accepts `message:` and `addRule` resolves the key correctly.**
## Step 4: Present the migration report (DRY-RUN)
Before any edits, output a summary for each target file:
```
## Migration report: app/Http/Requests/ClearSelectedVideoContentRequest.php
### Portable (4)
- items.*.action.type.required → ->required(message: '…') inside each() closure
- search.value.string → inline string(message: '…')
- name.max → ->max(255, message: '…')
- email.email → FluentRule::email(message: '…')
### Needs messageFor (2)
- items.*.qty.integer → ->digits(5)->messageFor('integer', '…') (composite non-last sub-rule)
- required_with on email/phone → ->requiredWith(…)->messageFor('required_with', '…') (variadic method)
### Unportable, stays in messages() (1)
- email_address.string → FluentRule::email() emits 'string' implicitly; no chain method to target. Keep.
### messages() method
After migration: keeps 1 key, method retained.
```
Ask the user to confirm per-file before applying.
## Step 5: Apply
One file at a time. For each:
1. Locate the target entry in `rules()`.
2. Rewrite the chain with `message:` / `messageFor` / closure inline per the classification.
3. Remove the migrated key from `messages()`.
4. If `messages()` returns `[]` after all migrations, delete the method.
5. Run tests on that file's FormRequest immediately (`vendor/bin/pest --filter={ClassName}`).
6. If tests fail, inspect and fix or revert — do not proceed to the next file until the current one is green.
## Step 6: Preserve behaviour — test parity
Before migration, capture the actual error messages produced by each `messages()` entry:
```
# Write a snapshot test that exercises each rule with a failing input and asserts the custom message surfaces.
```
Run the snapshot test after migration. The custom messages must still surface identically. If they don't, the migration is wrong — the skip-log classification probably missed a case.
## Guardrails
- **Never delete `messages()` if ANY key survives.** Keep the method with just the unportable keys.
- **Do not migrate keys using dynamic expressions** (interpolation, `match`, property access). Report and skip.
- **Preserve translation wrappers.** `__()`, `trans()`, `Lang::get()` values stay intact — they're just PHP expressions on the value side.
- **One FormRequest at a time.** Don't batch across files; each class may have subtle cross-references.
- **Do not change rule semantics.** Messages are cosmetic; any rewrite that changes WHICH rule fires or WHEN is out of scope for this skill.
## Common Patterns
### Simple unique key
```php
// Before
public function rules(): array {
return ['route' => ['required', FluentRule::string()->unique('workshops')]];
}
public function messages(): array {
return ['route.unique' => __('WorkshopRouteAlreadyExists')];
}
// After
public function rules(): array {
return [
'route' => ['required', FluentRule::string()->unique('workshops', message: __('WorkshopRouteAlreadyExists'))],
];
}
// messages() method removed entirely.
```
### each() inner closure
```php
// Before
public function rules(): array {
return [
'items' => FluentRule::array()->required()->each([
'qty' => FluentRule::numeric()->required()->integer(),
]),
];
}
public function messages(): array {
return ['items.*.qty.required' => 'Qty required.'];
}
// After
public function rules(): array {
return [
'items' => FluentRule::array()->required()->each([
'qty' => FluentRule::numeric()->required(message: 'Qty required.')->integer(),
]),
];
}
```
### Composite method — messageFor for first sub-rule
```php
// Before — `digits` fires after `integer`; custom message targets `integer`.
public function rules(): array {
return ['code' => FluentRule::numeric()->digits(5)];
}
public function messages(): array {
return ['code.integer' => 'Must be a whole number.'];
}
// After — messageFor retains the distinction; messages() deletable.
public function rules(): array {
return [
'code' => FluentRule::numeric()->digits(5)->messageFor('integer', 'Must be a whole number.'),
];
}
```
### Unportable — keep messages() entry
```php
// FluentRule::email() emits 'required' + 'string' + 'email' under some chains.
// 'email.string' has no method to attach to.
public function rules(): array {
return ['email_address' => FluentRule::email()->when(..., fn ($r) => $r->required())];
}
public function messages(): array {
return [
'email_address.required' => 'Required.', // portable via closure inline
'email_address.email' => 'Invalid.', // portable via FluentRule::email(message: ...)
'email_address.string' => 'Must be text.', // UNPORTABLE — stays
];
}
// After
public function rules(): array {
return [
'email_address' => FluentRule::email(message: 'Invalid.')
->when(..., fn ($r) => $r->required(message: 'Required.')),
];
}
public function messages(): array {
return [
// email.string is emitted implicitly by FluentRule::email();
// no chain method exists to target it, so it stays here.
'email_address.string' => 'Must be text.',
];
}
```
## See Also
- `fluent-validation` skill: full FluentRule API reference
- `fluent-validation-optimize` skill: broader validation improvements (labels, each(), children())
messages(): array → inline message:Rewrite FormRequest messages(): array overrides into colocated message: named args on the rule chain in rules(). Remove the now-empty messages() method when all keys port. Keep only unportable entries behind a comment-stub.
messages(): array, "kill messages arrays", "inline messages"rg "sandermuller/laravel-fluent-validation" composer.json
Required: sandermuller/laravel-fluent-validation ^1.19 or newer (inline message: param). If older, tell the user to upgrade first — earlier versions lack the message: named arg.
rg "function messages\(\)" --type php -l
For each match, also verify it overrides rules(): array on the same class (FormRequests). Skip test files and non-FormRequest classes.
messages(): array entryFor every 'field.rule' => 'msg' key, determine the migration path. Read the corresponding entry in rules() (same class) and walk the fluent chain.
| Shape | Rewrite |
|---|---|
Key 'field.rule' matches a chain method like ->rule(…) |
Inline: ->rule(…, message: 'msg') |
Key 'field.ruleName' matches the factory's implicit constraint (e.g. 'field.email' on FluentRule::email()) |
Factory-level: FluentRule::email(message: 'msg') |
Key matches ->rule(someRule, …) class-basename fallback |
Stays as ->messageFor('someRule', 'msg'); inline unavailable |
messages() entry, flag with a commentEach has a specific reason. Include the reason in the migration report so the user understands why.
FluentRule::email() chain with three messages() keys 'email.required', 'email.string', 'email.email'. The factory emits multiple validator rules internally; message: carries one binding. The email key can port via FluentRule::email(message: '…'); required ports if the chain has ->required(); string has no method to attach to (it's a byproduct of FluentRule::email() setting $constraints = ['string']). Keep string in messages() array.'field.required_with' + chain has ->requiredWith('email', 'phone'). PHP forbids params after variadic. Rewrite to ->requiredWith('email', 'phone')->message('msg') (shorter; ->message() binds to $lastConstraint which addRule set to 'required_with'). Not technically inline message:, but removes the messages() entry.'field.integer' + chain has ->digits(5). ->digits() adds integer then digits:N; message: binds to the last. Rewrite as ->digits(5)->messageFor('integer', 'msg').'field.date_format' + chain is FluentRule::date()->format('Y-m-d'). DateRule's key varies between 'date' and 'date_format:...' at build. Rewrite to FluentRule::date()->format('Y-m-d')->messageFor('date_format', 'msg')."{$field}.required" => 'msg', match expression, interpolated variable. Static analysis can't resolve. Leave entirely.each()/children(): 'items.*.name.required'. Walk the outer chain's ->each(...) closure / array to find the matching inner FluentRule. Rewrite there. Flag complex cases (deeply-nested / multi-level wildcards) for manual review.->when(…, fn ($r) => $r->required()): target rule lives inside the closure. Rewrite inside the closure: ->when($cond, fn ($r) => $r->required(message: 'msg')).->rule('x:args') escape-hatch string: 'field.x' => 'msg' + ->rule('x:args'). No named method. Rewrite to ->rule('x:args', message: 'msg') (rule() accepts message: since Phase 3a).'field.required' => __('messages.required'). Value is still an expr, inline works: ->required(message: __('messages.required')). Port normally.'field.required' => 'msg' where the corresponding rule in rules() is 'email' => $this->emailRules(). Cross-method resolution needed. Flag for manual review, tip: "inline the chain or move message into helper return."Macroable::macro(...) at runtime. Not statically resolvable. Leave with messageFor / message.ValidationRule object via ->rule(new MyRule()): message key derived from class-basename at runtime ('myRule' from MyRule). Rewrite to ->rule(new MyRule(), message: 'msg') — rule() accepts message: and addRule resolves the key correctly.Before any edits, output a summary for each target file:
## Migration report: app/Http/Requests/ClearSelectedVideoContentRequest.php
### Portable (4)
- items.*.action.type.required → ->required(message: '…') inside each() closure
- search.value.string → inline string(message: '…')
- name.max → ->max(255, message: '…')
- email.email → FluentRule::email(message: '…')
### Needs messageFor (2)
- items.*.qty.integer → ->digits(5)->messageFor('integer', '…') (composite non-last sub-rule)
- required_with on email/phone → ->requiredWith(…)->messageFor('required_with', '…') (variadic method)
### Unportable, stays in messages() (1)
- email_address.string → FluentRule::email() emits 'string' implicitly; no chain method to target. Keep.
### messages() method
After migration: keeps 1 key, method retained.
Ask the user to confirm per-file before applying.
One file at a time. For each:
rules().message: / messageFor / closure inline per the classification.messages().messages() returns [] after all migrations, delete the method.vendor/bin/pest --filter={ClassName}).Before migration, capture the actual error messages produced by each messages() entry:
# Write a snapshot test that exercises each rule with a failing input and asserts the custom message surfaces.
Run the snapshot test after migration. The custom messages must still surface identically. If they don't, the migration is wrong — the skip-log classification probably missed a case.
messages() if ANY key survives. Keep the method with just the unportable keys.match, property access). Report and skip.__(), trans(), Lang::get() values stay intact — they're just PHP expressions on the value side.// Before
public function rules(): array {
return ['route' => ['required', FluentRule::string()->unique('workshops')]];
}
public function messages(): array {
return ['route.unique' => __('WorkshopRouteAlreadyExists')];
}
// After
public function rules(): array {
return [
'route' => ['required', FluentRule::string()->unique('workshops', message: __('WorkshopRouteAlreadyExists'))],
];
}
// messages() method removed entirely.
// Before
public function rules(): array {
return [
'items' => FluentRule::array()->required()->each([
'qty' => FluentRule::numeric()->required()->integer(),
]),
];
}
public function messages(): array {
return ['items.*.qty.required' => 'Qty required.'];
}
// After
public function rules(): array {
return [
'items' => FluentRule::array()->required()->each([
'qty' => FluentRule::numeric()->required(message: 'Qty required.')->integer(),
]),
];
}
// Before — `digits` fires after `integer`; custom message targets `integer`.
public function rules(): array {
return ['code' => FluentRule::numeric()->digits(5)];
}
public function messages(): array {
return ['code.integer' => 'Must be a whole number.'];
}
// After — messageFor retains the distinction; messages() deletable.
public function rules(): array {
return [
'code' => FluentRule::numeric()->digits(5)->messageFor('integer', 'Must be a whole number.'),
];
}
// FluentRule::email() emits 'required' + 'string' + 'email' under some chains.
// 'email.string' has no method to attach to.
public function rules(): array {
return ['email_address' => FluentRule::email()->when(..., fn ($r) => $r->required())];
}
public function messages(): array {
return [
'email_address.required' => 'Required.', // portable via closure inline
'email_address.email' => 'Invalid.', // portable via FluentRule::email(message: ...)
'email_address.string' => 'Must be text.', // UNPORTABLE — stays
];
}
// After
public function rules(): array {
return [
'email_address' => FluentRule::email(message: 'Invalid.')
->when(..., fn ($r) => $r->required(message: 'Required.')),
];
}
public function messages(): array {
return [
// email.string is emitted implicitly by FluentRule::email();
// no chain method exists to target it, so it stays here.
'email_address.string' => 'Must be text.',
];
}
fluent-validation skill: full FluentRule API referencefluent-validation-optimize skill: broader validation improvements (labels, each(), children())How can I help you explore Laravel packages today?